在布比卡因中添加可乐定或右美托咪定可延长儿童骶管阻滞镇痛时间。
Addition of clonidine or dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine prolongs caudal analgesia in children.
作者信息
El-Hennawy A M, Abd-Elwahab A M, Abd-Elmaksoud A M, El-Ozairy H S, Boulis S R
机构信息
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
出版信息
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Aug;103(2):268-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep159. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
BACKGROUND
Caudal block is a common technique for paediatric analgesia but with the disadvantage of short duration of action after single injection. Caudal dexmedetomidine and clonidine could offer significant analgesic benefits. We compared the analgesic effects and side-effects of dexmedetomidine and clonidine added to bupivacaine in paediatric patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries.
METHODS
Sixty patients (6 months to 6 yr) were evenly and randomly assigned into three groups in a double-blinded manner. After sevoflurane in oxygen anaesthesia, each patient received a single caudal dose of bupivacaine 0.25% (1 ml kg(-1)) combined with either dexmedetomidine 2 microg kg(-1) in normal saline 1 ml, clonidine 2 microg kg(-1) in normal saline 1 ml, or corresponding volume of normal saline according to group assignment. Haemodynamic variables, end-tidal sevoflurane, and emergence time were monitored. Postoperative analgesia, use of analgesics, and side-effects were assessed during the first 24 h.
RESULTS
Addition of dexmedetomidine or clonidine to caudal bupivacaine significantly promoted analgesia time [median (95% confidence interval, CI): 16 (14-18) and 12 (3-21) h, respectively] than the use of bupivacaine alone [median (95% CI): 5 (4-6) h] with P<0.001. However, there was no statistically significant difference between dexmedetomidine and clonidine as regards the analgesia time (P=0.796). No significant difference was observed in incidence of haemodynamic changes or side-effects.
CONCLUSIONS
Addition of dexmedetomidine or clonidine to caudal bupivacaine significantly promoted analgesia in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries with no significant advantage of dexmedetomidine over clonidine and without an increase in incidence of side-effects.
背景
骶管阻滞是小儿镇痛的常用技术,但单次注射后作用时间短。骶管注射右美托咪定和可乐定可带来显著的镇痛效果。我们比较了右美托咪定和可乐定添加到布比卡因中用于接受下腹部手术的小儿患者的镇痛效果和副作用。
方法
60例患者(6个月至6岁)以双盲方式平均随机分为三组。在七氟醚吸入麻醉后,根据分组,每位患者接受单次骶管剂量的0.25%布比卡因(1 ml·kg⁻¹),分别联合1 ml生理盐水中的右美托咪定2 μg·kg⁻¹、1 ml生理盐水中的可乐定2 μg·kg⁻¹或相应体积的生理盐水。监测血流动力学变量、呼气末七氟醚和苏醒时间。在术后24小时内评估术后镇痛、镇痛药使用情况和副作用。
结果
与单独使用布比卡因相比,骶管布比卡因中添加右美托咪定或可乐定显著延长了镇痛时间[中位数(95%置信区间,CI):分别为16(14 - 18)小时和12(3 - 21)小时],单独使用布比卡因时为[中位数(95%CI):5(4 - 6)小时],P < 0.001。然而,右美托咪定和可乐定在镇痛时间方面无统计学显著差异(P = 0.796)。血流动力学变化或副作用的发生率无显著差异。
结论
骶管布比卡因中添加右美托咪定或可乐定可显著增强接受下腹部手术儿童的镇痛效果,右美托咪定并不比可乐定有显著优势,且副作用发生率未增加。