Boonen Annelies, van Berkel Monique, Kirchberger Inge, Cieza Alarcos, Stucki Gerald, van der Heijde Désirée
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Aug;48(8):997-1002. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep150. Epub 2009 Jun 19.
In AS there is no agreed definition of which aspects are important when describing functioning. This limits the possibility to classify, evaluate and investigate the consequences of the disease. This study aimed to achieve consensus among health professionals on which aspects of functioning are typical and relevant for AS patients using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as reference.
An international Delphi study through e-mail was performed among different health professions. Answers to open questions on areas relevant for functioning in the first round were linked to ICF categories and analysed in the two following two rounds for the degree of consensus.
Of the 267 experts invited, 126 agreed to participate and 74 participated in all rounds; 28 were rheumatologists, 6 rheumatology nurses, 24 physiotherapists, 2 occupational therapists, 4 psychologists, 8 rehabilitation physicians and 2 social workers. More than 80% agreement was reached on 141 ICF categories, of which 30 (21%) were part of Body functions; 27 (19%) of Body structures; 56 (40%) of Activities and Participation; and 28 (20%) of Environmental factors. In addition, two Personal factors-illness knowledge and coping-were agreed upon.
141 ICF categories and two personal factors represent the reference of functioning in AS from the perspective of health professional. The largest number of categories concerned restrictions in activities. Also, the impact of AS on participation in life situations and the role of environmental factors were underscored. This broadens the view on functioning in AS and has implications for future research into functioning.
在强直性脊柱炎(AS)中,对于描述功能时哪些方面重要尚无公认的定义。这限制了对该疾病进行分类、评估和研究其后果的可能性。本研究旨在以《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)为参考,就功能的哪些方面对于AS患者具有典型性和相关性,在卫生专业人员中达成共识。
通过电子邮件对不同卫生专业人员开展了一项国际德尔菲研究。第一轮中针对与功能相关领域的开放性问题的回答与ICF类别相关联,并在接下来的两轮中分析共识程度。
在邀请的267位专家中,126位同意参与,74位参与了所有轮次;其中28位是风湿病学家,6位是风湿病护士,24位是物理治疗师,2位是职业治疗师,4位是心理学家,8位是康复医师,2位是社会工作者。在141个ICF类别上达成了超过80%的共识,其中30个(21%)属于身体功能;27个(19%)属于身体结构;56个(40%)属于活动与参与;28个(20%)属于环境因素。此外,还就两个个人因素——疾病知识和应对达成了共识。
141个ICF类别和两个个人因素代表了从卫生专业人员角度看AS功能的参考标准。涉及活动受限的类别数量最多。此外,强调了AS对生活情境参与的影响以及环境因素的作用。这拓宽了对AS功能的认识,并对未来功能研究具有启示意义。