Bateman Timothy M, Heller Gary V, McGhie A Iain, Courter Staci A, Golub Robert A, Case James A, Cullom S James
Mid America Heart Institute, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):726-35. doi: 10.1007/s12350-009-9109-6. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
New iterative algorithms for scatter compensation (SC), noise suppression, and depth-dependent collimator resolution (RR) can shorten rest and stress SPECT acquisitions by 50% while maintaining quality and accuracy equivalent to conventional scans. Full-time stress-only myocardial perfusion SPECT is accurate and efficient when combined with line-source attenuation correction (LSAC). We investigated the potential for half-time stress-only LSAC-SPECT by comparing this to conventional rest/stress SPECT in patients imaged for suspected CAD at three different centers.
One hundred and ten patients (58% men, 53% exercise) had 64 projection rest/stress Tc-99m ECG-gated SPECT with simultaneous Gd-153 LSAC: 18 had <or=5% CAD likelihood and 92 had coronary angiography. The stress scans were retrospectively 'stripped' to create equally spaced 32 projection "half-time" (HT) scans for the emission and transmission (TX) projections. Astonish (Philips, Milpitas, CA) processing with AC, SC, and RR was applied to the HT data with the HT TX maps reconstructed using a Bayesian iterative method. The conventional rest/stress image sets processed using filtered back projection and without AC and the HT-AC stress-only images were interpreted in random sequence by consensus of two readers blinded to clinical information in separate reading sessions.
Comparing rest/stress FBP and HT-LSAC, stress perfusion quality was excellent/good in 82 and 89% (P = .13); interpretive certainty (definitely normal or abnormal) was 88 and 95% (P = .14); sensitivity was 77 and 83% (P = .38); specificity was 67 and 71% (P = .65); normalcy was 94 and 100% (P = 1.0); SSS for CAD pts was 7.4 vs 7.8 and for non-CAD pts was 0.7 vs 0 (P = .44 and .16, respectively). Mean stress LVEF was 60% in both groups.
Stress-only imaging with HT-LSAC using the Astonish acquisition/processing method provides results equivalent to conventional rest/stress scanning. This new approach has the potential to significantly improve operational efficiency without sacrificing accuracy.
用于散射补偿(SC)、噪声抑制和深度依赖准直器分辨率(RR)的新型迭代算法可将静息和负荷单光子发射计算机断层显像(SPECT)采集时间缩短50%,同时保持与传统扫描相当的质量和准确性。当与线源衰减校正(LSAC)相结合时,仅进行负荷心肌灌注SPECT既准确又高效。我们通过在三个不同中心对疑似冠心病患者进行成像,将仅进行负荷的半时LSAC-SPECT与传统静息/负荷SPECT进行比较,研究其可能性。
110例患者(58%为男性,53%进行运动试验)进行了64帧投影的静息/负荷锝-99m心电图门控SPECT检查,并同时进行钆-153 LSAC:18例CAD可能性≤5%,92例进行了冠状动脉造影。对负荷扫描进行回顾性“剥离”,以创建发射和透射(TX)投影的等间隔32帧投影“半时”(HT)扫描。使用AC、SC和RR的Astonish(飞利浦,加利福尼亚州米尔皮塔斯)处理应用于HT数据,HT TX图使用贝叶斯迭代方法重建。由两名对临床信息不知情的读者在单独的阅读环节中以共识方式对使用滤波反投影且未进行AC处理的传统静息/负荷图像集以及仅进行HT-AC负荷的图像进行随机顺序解读。
比较静息/负荷滤波反投影(FBP)和HT-LSAC,负荷灌注质量优秀/良好的比例分别为82%和89%(P = 0.13);解读确定性(肯定正常或异常)分别为88%和95%(P = 0.14);敏感性分别为77%和83%(P = 0.38);特异性分别为67%和71%(P = 0.65);正常率分别为94%和100%(P = 1.0);CAD患者的心肌灌注积分(SSS)分别为7.4和7.8,非CAD患者分别为0.7和0(P分别为0.44和0.16)。两组的平均负荷左心室射血分数(LVEF)均为60%。
使用Astonish采集/处理方法进行仅负荷的HT-LSAC成像可提供与传统静息/负荷扫描相当的结果。这种新方法有可能在不牺牲准确性的情况下显著提高操作效率。