Suppr超能文献

魁北克的断指再植手术:快速治疗的瓶颈

Replantation surgery in Quebec: The bottlenecks to rapid care.

作者信息

Borsuk Daniel E, Zadeh Teanoosh, Lee Chen, Moore Karl, Tan Grace

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.

出版信息

Can J Plast Surg. 2006 Fall;14(3):155-7. doi: 10.1177/229255030601400306.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Time delays resulting in prolonged ischemia have a significant impact on the successful reattachment of amputated body parts. No studies have addressed the issues surrounding delays from the time of the accident to the start of replantation surgery. The present paper identifies the bottlenecks that prolong the time before patients are able to gain access to a replant team.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients underwent microsurgical replantation, because of traumatic amputation, at a university-based hospital from 1996 to 2003. The charts were analyzed to ascertain individual time intervals from the onset of injury until the beginning of replant surgery.

RESULTS

The average length of time for patients who came directly to the replant centre was 3 h 40 min before surgery began. In contrast, for those referred from outlying hospitals, the elapsed time was 6 h 21 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Two major bottlenecks were found. First, for patients who were referred from other health centres, delays were due to a lack of information as to where patients could receive appropriate replant surgery. Second, delays at the replant centre were primarily due to insufficient physical and human resources in the operating room.

摘要

引言

导致缺血时间延长的时间延迟对断肢再植手术的成功再植有重大影响。尚无研究探讨从事故发生到再植手术开始这段时间延迟的相关问题。本文确定了延长患者获得再植团队救治时间的瓶颈因素。

方法

1996年至2003年期间,一所大学附属医院共有50例因创伤性截肢接受显微外科再植手术的患者。分析病历以确定从受伤开始到再植手术开始的各个时间间隔。

结果

直接前往再植中心的患者,手术开始前的平均时长为3小时40分钟。相比之下,从外地医院转诊而来的患者,所用时长为6小时21分钟。

结论

发现了两个主要瓶颈因素。其一,对于从其他医疗中心转诊而来的患者,延迟是由于缺乏关于患者可在何处接受适当再植手术的信息。其二,再植中心的延迟主要是由于手术室的物力和人力不足。

相似文献

1
Replantation surgery in Quebec: The bottlenecks to rapid care.
Can J Plast Surg. 2006 Fall;14(3):155-7. doi: 10.1177/229255030601400306.
2
Clinical factors associated with replantation after traumatic major upper extremity amputation.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Oct;132(4):911-919. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829f4a49.
3
Digit Replantation Practice: A Comparison of Three Rat Models.
J Hand Microsurg. 2021 Jan 7;15(1):37-40. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722537. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Replantation versus revision of amputated fingers in patients air-transported to a level 1 trauma center.
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Jun;35(6):936-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.02.031. Epub 2010 May 21.
6
The microsurgical instrument tray - a tremor-free assistant for stabilising amputated parts in replant surgery.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(8):961. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.01.063. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
7
Determinants of Success in Single- and Multi-Digit Replant.
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2023 Feb;31(1):53-60. doi: 10.1177/22925503211024767. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
8
[Replantation of the hand and fingers].
Rev Prat. 1994 Nov 15;44(18):2451-5.
9
Digital replantation teaching model in rats.
Microsurgery. 2000;20(1):42-4. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2752(2000)20:1<42::aid-micr8>3.0.co;2-4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验