Sharma Prem L, Nettles James H, Feldman Anya, Rapp Kimberly, Schinazi Raymond F
Center for AIDS Research , Laboratory of Biochemical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, United States.
Antiviral Res. 2009 Sep;83(3):317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
While HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations of M to V at position 184 are commonly observed in the clinic, the double mutation of 65R+74V is rarely seen. It has been demonstrated that rapid R-->K reversion occurs at RT codon 65 during replication of HIV-1 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells containing 65R+74V mutations and that processivity of the RT is reduced relative to wild type. However, clinical studies show that M184V can be detected after several months of therapy interruption, suggesting more effective processivity. Herein, the in vitro RT processivity of genetically engineered M184V and double mutant 65R+74V was compared. Virion-associated RTs of WT pNL4-3, K65R, L74V, M184V and 65R+74V were used to perform RT processivity assays in the presence of trap, poly(rC)-oligo(dG). Both RTs with 184V and 65R+74V mutations exhibited similar processivity when compared with each other and a significantly decreased processivity as compared to WT RT. Both mutant RTs synthesized shorter cDNA molecules (37-42 nt) relative to WT RT, which made longer (65-70 nt) cDNA molecules. Since these surprising biochemical results cannot explain the clinical phenotype, a hypothesis is presented to explain the discrepancy and suggest new approaches for future testing.
虽然在临床上常见HIV-1逆转录酶(RT)第184位密码子由M突变为V,但65R + 74V双突变却很少见。已证明,在含有65R + 74V突变的人外周血单核细胞中HIV-1复制期间,RT密码子65处会迅速发生R→K回复突变,且该RT的持续合成能力相对于野生型有所降低。然而,临床研究表明,在治疗中断数月后仍可检测到M184V,这表明其持续合成能力更强。在此,对基因工程改造的M184V和双突变体65R + 74V的体外RT持续合成能力进行了比较。使用野生型pNL4-3、K65R、L74V、M184V和65R + 74V的病毒体相关RT,在存在捕获物、聚(rC)-寡聚(dG)的情况下进行RT持续合成能力测定。与野生型RT相比,具有184V和65R + 74V突变的两种RT相互之间表现出相似的持续合成能力,且持续合成能力均显著降低。与能合成更长(65 - 70 nt)cDNA分子的野生型RT相比,两种突变型RT合成的cDNA分子更短(37 - 42 nt)。由于这些令人惊讶的生化结果无法解释临床表型,因此提出一个假设来解释这种差异,并为未来的测试提出新方法。