Suppr超能文献

黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检:适应证与理论依据

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: indications and rationale.

作者信息

Phan Giao Q, Messina Jane L, Sondak Vernon K, Zager Jonathan S

机构信息

Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Control. 2009 Jul;16(3):234-9. doi: 10.1177/107327480901600305.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The disease status of regional lymph nodes is the most important prognostic indicator for patients with melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was developed as a technique to surgically assess the regional lymph nodes and spare node-negative patients unnecessary and potentially morbid complete lymphadenectomies.

METHODS

We reviewed the literature on SLNB for cutaneous melanoma to provide insight into the rationale for the current widespread use of SLNB.

RESULTS

Multiple studies show that the status of the SLN is an important prognostic indicator. Those with positive SLNs have significantly decreased disease-free and melanoma-specific survival compared with those who have negative SLNs. In the Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial I (MSLT-I), in which patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma were randomized to SLNB (and immediate completion lymphadenectomy if the SLN was positive) vs observation (and a lymphadenectomy only after presenting with clinically evident recurrence), the 5-year survival rate was 72.3% for patients with positive sentinel nodes and 90.2% for those with negative sentinel nodes (P < .001). Although overall survival was not increased in patients who underwent SLNB compared with those who were randomized to observation, patients who underwent SLNB had a significantly increased 5-year disease-free survival rate compared with those who underwent observation alone (78.3% in the biopsy group and 73.1% in the observation group; P = .009). For those with nodal metastases, patients who underwent SLNB and immediate lymphadenectomy had an increased overall 5-year survival rate compared with those who had lymphadenectomy only after presenting with clinically evident disease (72.3% vs 52.4%; P = .004). Moreover, other studies show that for patients with thin melanomas <or= 1.0 mm, the overall survival rate is significantly worse for those with positive SLNs compared to those with negative SLNs. For thin melanomas, Breslow depth >or= 0.76 mm and increased mitotic rate have been shown to be associated with an increased incidence of SLN metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB provides important prognostic and staging data with minimal morbidity and can be used to identify regional node-negative patients who would not benefit from a complete nodal dissection. In our opinion, SLNB should be performed on most patients (with acceptable surgical and anesthesia risk) who have melanomas with a Breslow depth >or= 0.76 mm.

摘要

背景

区域淋巴结的疾病状态是黑色素瘤患者最重要的预后指标。前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)作为一种手术评估区域淋巴结的技术而被开发出来,使淋巴结阴性的患者避免不必要的、可能导致病态的根治性淋巴结清扫术。

方法

我们回顾了关于皮肤黑色素瘤SLNB的文献,以深入了解当前SLNB广泛应用的基本原理。

结果

多项研究表明,前哨淋巴结(SLN)的状态是一个重要的预后指标。SLN阳性的患者与SLN阴性的患者相比,无病生存期和黑色素瘤特异性生存期显著降低。在多中心选择性淋巴结清扫试验I(MSLT-I)中,中度厚度黑色素瘤患者被随机分为SLNB组(如果SLN阳性则立即进行根治性淋巴结清扫术)和观察组(仅在出现临床明显复发后进行淋巴结清扫术),前哨淋巴结阳性患者的5年生存率为72.3%,前哨淋巴结阴性患者为90.2%(P <.001)。虽然与随机接受观察的患者相比,接受SLNB的患者总生存期没有增加,但与仅接受观察的患者相比,接受SLNB的患者5年无病生存率显著提高(活检组为78.3%,观察组为73.1%;P =.009)。对于有淋巴结转移的患者,与仅在出现临床明显疾病后进行淋巴结清扫术的患者相比,接受SLNB并立即进行淋巴结清扫术患者的5年总生存率有所提高(72.3%对52.4%;P =.004)。此外,其他研究表明,对于厚度≤1.0 mm的薄型黑色素瘤患者,SLN阳性患者的总生存率明显低于SLN阴性患者。对于薄型黑色素瘤,已证明Breslow深度≥0.76 mm和有丝分裂率增加与SLN转移发生率增加相关。

结论

SLNB以最小的发病率提供重要的预后和分期数据,可用于确定那些无法从根治性淋巴结清扫术中获益的区域淋巴结阴性患者。我们认为,对于大多数Breslow深度≥0.76 mm黑色素瘤患者(具有可接受的手术和麻醉风险)应进行SLNB。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验