Presse Nancy, Shatenstein Bryna, Kergoat Marie-Jeanne, Ferland Guylaine
Centre de recherche, Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal and Département de nutrition, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Jul;109(7):1251-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.04.019.
The study objective was to validate a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) specifically designed to measure dietary vitamin K intake. A 50-item FFQ was interviewer-administered and compared with data previously obtained from 5-day food records. Thirty-nine community-dwelling healthy men and women aged 65 to 85 years were recruited from the Montréal metropolitan area. Absolute and relative agreements between methods were assessed. Vitamin K intake measured by the vitamin K FFQ (mean+/-standard deviation; 222+/-186 microg/day) was significantly higher than that obtained by food records (135+/-153 microg/day; P<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis on log(10)-transformed data indicated that vitamin K intake from vitamin K FFQ was 2.26 times (95% confidence interval: 1.90 to 2.67) higher than food records, limits of agreement ranging from 0.80 to 6.35. However, correlation between methods was strong and highly significant (r=0.83; P<0.001). Cross-classification also showed that 72% of participants were correctly classified into thirds and only 8% were grossly miscategorized. Weighted kappa value (kappa=0.60) also indicated a good relative agreement. In light of these results, the vitamin K FFQ is a valid tool for ranking individuals according to their vitamin K intake. The poor absolute agreement likely results from the inability for food records to adequately measure the usual intake of episodically consumed foods, particularly those high in vitamin K. The vitamin K FFQ will be useful in large-scale, population-based research on vitamin K and disease as well as in clinical practice, especially that focusing on anticoagulant therapy.
本研究的目的是验证一份专门设计用于测量膳食维生素K摄入量的半定量食物频率问卷(FFQ)。一份包含50个条目的FFQ由访谈员进行询问,并与之前通过5天食物记录获得的数据进行比较。从蒙特利尔大都市区招募了39名年龄在65至85岁之间的社区健康男性和女性。评估了两种方法之间的绝对一致性和相对一致性。通过维生素K FFQ测量的维生素K摄入量(均值±标准差;222±186微克/天)显著高于通过食物记录获得的摄入量(135±153微克/天;P<0.001)。对经log(10)转换的数据进行的Bland-Altman分析表明,来自维生素K FFQ的维生素K摄入量比食物记录高2.26倍(95%置信区间:1.90至2.67),一致性界限范围为0.80至6.35。然而,两种方法之间的相关性很强且高度显著(r=0.83;P<0.001)。交叉分类还显示,72%的参与者被正确分类到三分位数中,只有8%被严重错误分类。加权kappa值(kappa=0.60)也表明相对一致性良好。鉴于这些结果,维生素K FFQ是根据个体维生素K摄入量对其进行排名的有效工具。绝对一致性较差可能是由于食物记录无法充分测量偶尔食用的食物(尤其是维生素K含量高的食物)的通常摄入量。维生素K FFQ将有助于开展关于维生素K与疾病的大规模人群研究以及临床实践,特别是专注于抗凝治疗的临床实践。