Suppr超能文献

经髂骨植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD):除颤向量的灵活性带来持续成功。

Transiliac ICD implantation: defibrillation vector flexibility produces consistent success.

作者信息

Ching Chi Keong, Elayi Claude S, Di Biase Luigi, Barrett Conor D, Martin David O, Saliba Walid I, Wazni Oussama, Kanj Mohamed, Burkhardt David J, Schweikert Robert A, Wilkoff Bruce L

机构信息

Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2009 Jul;6(7):978-83. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.03.031. Epub 2009 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The transiliac approach to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation is an alternative in patients for whom pectoral placements are contraindicated. The defibrillation vector is altered from the pectoral configuration because of pulse generator placement in one of the upper abdominal quadrants and separate single-coil, active-fixation defibrillation leads positioned in the high right atrium and right ventricular apex.

OBJECTIVE

The feasibility, safety, and complications of this approach and the results of defibrillation testing (DFT) with this configuration are described.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients (16 male and 7 female, mean age 65.7 +/- 13.2 years) required transiliac approach to ICD placement. The leads were inserted through the iliac vein immediately superior to the inguinal ligament. When required, a subcutaneous coil was tunneled posterior to the left ventricle from the left axilla.

RESULTS

The right iliac vein entry was used in 17 patients, with placement of the pulse generator in the left upper quadrant in 16 patients. Atrial and ventricular lead pacing and sensing function were acceptable. Initial defibrillation success with a safety margin of 10 J was achieved in 15 patients. With the placement of an additional subcutaneous coil in the remaining 8 patients, defibrillation success with a safety margin of 10 J was increased to 19 patients, whereas defibrillation success with a safety margin of 5 J was achieved in all patients, although 1 patient required repeat testing 24 hours after implantation. There were no acute complications. Late complications occurred in 3 patients, comprised of atrial lead malfunction, device infection, and right ventricular defibrillation lead fracture.

CONCLUSION

The iliac vein approach to ICD implantation is a safe and effective alternative technique. Flexibility in lead placement, defibrillation vectors, and careful DFT are required to produce a consistently effective system.

摘要

背景

对于禁忌经胸植入的患者,经髂途径植入植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)是一种替代方法。由于脉冲发生器置于上腹部象限之一,且单独的单线圈主动固定除颤导线分别置于高位右心房和右心室心尖,除颤向量与经胸配置不同。

目的

描述该方法的可行性、安全性和并发症以及这种配置下除颤测试(DFT)的结果。

方法

23例患者(16例男性,7例女性,平均年龄65.7±13.2岁)需要经髂途径植入ICD。导线经髂静脉在腹股沟韧带上方立即插入。必要时,将皮下线圈从左腋窝经左心室后方隧道引出。

结果

17例患者采用右髂静脉入路,16例患者将脉冲发生器置于左上象限。心房和心室导线的起搏和感知功能良好。15例患者首次除颤成功,安全裕度为10 J。在其余8例患者中增加一个皮下线圈后,安全裕度为10 J的除颤成功率提高到19例,所有患者安全裕度为5 J的除颤均成功,尽管1例患者在植入后24小时需要重复测试。无急性并发症。3例患者出现晚期并发症,包括心房导线故障、装置感染和右心室除颤导线断裂。

结论

经髂静脉途径植入ICD是一种安全有效的替代技术。需要在导线放置、除颤向量方面具有灵活性,并进行仔细的DFT,以建立一个始终有效的系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验