Suppr超能文献

特殊教育教师的执照考试:这些考试对阅读教学和数学知识的评估效果如何。

Licensure tests for special education teachers: how well they assess knowledge of reading instruction and mathematics.

作者信息

Stotsky Sandra

机构信息

University of Arkansas, USA.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;42(5):464-74. doi: 10.1177/0022219409338740. Epub 2009 Jun 26.

Abstract

To determine the extent to which knowledge of evidence-based reading instruction and mathematics is assessed on licensure tests for prospective special education teachers, this study drew on information provided by Educational Testing Service (ETS), the American Board for Certification of Teacher Excellence, and National Evaluation Systems (now Evaluation Systems group of Pearson). It estimated the percentage of test items on phonemic awareness, phonics, and vocabulary knowledge and on mathematics content. It also analyzed descriptions of ETS's tests of "principles of teaching and learning." Findings imply that prospective special education teachers should be required to take both a dedicated test of evidence-based reading instructional knowledge, as in California, Massachusetts, and Virginia, and a test of mathematical knowledge, as in Massachusetts. States must design their own tests of teaching principles to assess knowledge of evidence-based educational theories.

摘要

为了确定在未来特殊教育教师的执照考试中,基于证据的阅读教学和数学知识的评估程度,本研究借鉴了教育考试服务中心(ETS)、美国卓越教师认证委员会和国家评估系统(现为培生集团的评估系统组)提供的信息。它估计了关于音素意识、自然拼读法和词汇知识以及数学内容的测试项目的百分比。它还分析了ETS的“教学与学习原则”测试的描述。研究结果表明,应该要求未来的特殊教育教师既参加像加利福尼亚州、马萨诸塞州和弗吉尼亚州那样专门的基于证据的阅读教学知识测试,也参加像马萨诸塞州那样的数学知识测试。各州必须设计自己的教学原则测试,以评估基于证据的教育理论知识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验