Satyanarayana A, Kaldis P
Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702-1201, USA.
Oncogene. 2009 Aug 20;28(33):2925-39. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.170. Epub 2009 Jun 29.
After a decade of extensive work on gene knockout mouse models of cell-cycle regulators, the classical model of cell-cycle regulation was seriously challenged. Several unexpected compensatory mechanisms were uncovered among cyclins and Cdks in these studies. The most astonishing observation is that Cdk2 is dispensable for the regulation of the mitotic cell cycle with both Cdk4 and Cdk1 covering for Cdk2's functions. Similar to yeast, it was recently discovered that Cdk1 alone can drive the mammalian cell cycle, indicating that the regulation of the mammalian cell cycle is highly conserved. Nevertheless, cell-cycle-independent functions of Cdks and cyclins such as in DNA damage repair are still under investigation. Here we review the compensatory mechanisms among major cyclins and Cdks in mammalian cell-cycle regulation.
在对细胞周期调节因子的基因敲除小鼠模型进行了十年的广泛研究之后,经典的细胞周期调节模型受到了严峻挑战。在这些研究中,人们发现细胞周期蛋白和周期蛋白依赖性激酶(Cdks)之间存在几种意想不到的补偿机制。最令人惊讶的发现是,在有丝分裂细胞周期的调节中,Cdk2是可有可无的,Cdk4和Cdk1共同承担了Cdk2的功能。与酵母类似,最近发现仅Cdk1就能驱动哺乳动物细胞周期,这表明哺乳动物细胞周期的调节具有高度保守性。然而,Cdks和细胞周期蛋白在DNA损伤修复等与细胞周期无关的功能仍在研究中。在此,我们综述了哺乳动物细胞周期调节中主要细胞周期蛋白和Cdks之间的补偿机制。