Langford Ann, Johnson Brian
Office for National Statistics.
Health Stat Q. 2009 Summer(42):6-21. doi: 10.1057/hsq.2009.14.
This analysis of mortality in women aged 25-59 in 2001-03 found that those in the least advantaged social economic class had a mortality rate around twice that of women in the most advantaged class. This article uses the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC) and examines the relative merits of classification based on a woman's 'own' occupation as opposed to a 'combined' classification which also takes into account the husband's NS-SEC class, where available. The results demonstrate a strong socio-economic gradient in mortality for adult women under both classification methods. Under the 'combined' classification, women in the least advantaged NS-SEC class had a mortality rate 2.6 times that of those in the most advantaged class. Based on the women's'own' occupation, the comparable ratio was 1.9. These results set a benchmark for the future monitoring of socio-economic mortality inequalities in women, and also provide a comparison between inequalities affecting women and men.
对2001年至2003年25至59岁女性死亡率的分析发现,社会经济地位最不利阶层的女性死亡率约为最有利阶层女性的两倍。本文采用国家统计局社会经济分类法(NS - SEC),并考察了基于女性“自身”职业的分类与“综合”分类(后者还会在可行的情况下考虑丈夫的NS - SEC阶层)的相对优点。结果表明,在两种分类方法下,成年女性死亡率都存在很强的社会经济梯度。在“综合”分类下,社会经济地位最不利的NS - SEC阶层女性的死亡率是最有利阶层女性的2.6倍。基于女性“自身”职业,可比比率为1.9。这些结果为未来监测女性社会经济死亡率不平等设定了基准,也提供了影响女性和男性的不平等之间的比较。