警觉恒河猴内侧听觉带皮层的功能特化

Functional specialization of medial auditory belt cortex in the alert rhesus monkey.

作者信息

Kusmierek Pawel, Rauschecker Josef P

机构信息

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Georgetown University, NRB WP23, 3970 Reservoir Rd. NW, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 2009 Sep;102(3):1606-22. doi: 10.1152/jn.00167.2009. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

Abstract

Responses of neural units in two areas of the medial auditory belt (middle medial area [MM] and rostral medial area [RM]) were tested with tones, noise bursts, monkey calls (MC), and environmental sounds (ES) in microelectrode recordings from two alert rhesus monkeys. For comparison, recordings were also performed from two core areas (primary auditory area [A1] and rostral area [R]) of the auditory cortex. All four fields showed cochleotopic organization, with best (center) frequency [BF(c)] gradients running in opposite directions in A1 and MM than in R and RM. The medial belt was characterized by a stronger preference for band-pass noise than for pure tones found medially to the core areas. Response latencies were shorter for the two more posterior (middle) areas MM and A1 than for the two rostral areas R and RM, reaching values as low as 6 ms for high BF(c) in MM and A1, and strongly depended on BF(c). The medial belt areas exhibited a higher selectivity to all stimuli, in particular to noise bursts, than the core areas. An increased selectivity to tones and noise bursts was also found in the anterior fields; the opposite was true for highly temporally modulated ES. Analysis of the structure of neural responses revealed that neurons were driven by low-level acoustic features in all fields. Thus medial belt areas RM and MM have to be considered early stages of auditory cortical processing. The anteroposterior difference in temporal processing indices suggests that R and RM may belong to a different hierarchical level or a different computational network than A1 and MM.

摘要

在两只清醒恒河猴的微电极记录中,使用纯音、短声、猴叫声(MC)和环境声音(ES)测试了内侧听觉带两个区域(中间内侧区[MM]和吻内侧区[RM])神经单元的反应。为作比较,还从听觉皮层的两个核心区域(初级听觉区[A1]和吻区[R])进行了记录。所有四个区域均呈现出耳蜗拓扑组织,A1和MM中最佳(中心)频率[BF(c)]梯度的方向与R和RM中的相反。内侧带的特点是,与核心区域内侧相比,对带通噪声的偏好强于对纯音的偏好。两个更靠后的(中间的)区域MM和A1的反应潜伏期比两个吻侧区域R和RM短,MM和A1中高BF(c)时反应潜伏期低至6毫秒,且强烈依赖于BF(c)。内侧带区域对所有刺激,尤其是对短声,表现出比核心区域更高的选择性。在前部区域对纯音和短声的选择性也增加;对于高度时间调制的ES则相反。对神经反应结构的分析表明,所有区域的神经元均由低水平声学特征驱动。因此,内侧带区域RM和MM必须被视为听觉皮层处理的早期阶段。时间处理指标的前后差异表明,R和RM可能与A1和MM属于不同的层级水平或不同的计算网络。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索