Radtke Andreas, Kong Fanrong, Bergh Kåre, Lyng Randi Valsø, Ko Danny, Gilbert Gwendolyn L
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's and Women's Health, Trondheim, Norway.
J Microbiol Methods. 2009 Sep;78(3):363-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2009.06.017. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
We compared serotyping to genotyping of group B streptococcal (GBS) surface proteins in 147 Australasian isolates. Results were concordant for the two methods in 73.8% of 122 isolates, discordant for three and partially discordant for 29 isolates. For the purpose of epidemiological typing of GBS, genotyping is superior to serotyping.
我们比较了147株澳大利亚分离株中B族链球菌（GBS）表面蛋白的血清分型和基因分型。在122株分离株中，两种方法的结果在73.8%的情况下是一致的，3株结果不一致，29株结果部分不一致。就GBS的流行病学分型而言，基因分型优于血清分型。
Zotero 插件