• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放式与关节镜下肩袖修复术的成本效益比较。

Cost-effectiveness of open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Mar;19(2):258-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.004
PMID:19574063
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Economic evaluation of surgical procedures is necessary in view of more expensive newer techniques emerging in an increasingly cost-conscious health care environment. This study compares the cost-effectiveness of open rotator cuff repair with arthroscopic repair for moderately size tears.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study of 30 consecutive patients, of whom 15 had an arthroscopic repair and 15 had an open procedure. Clinical effectiveness was assessed using Oxford and Constant shoulder scores. Costs were estimated from departmental and hospital financial data.

RESULTS

At last follow-up, no difference Oxford and Constant shoulder scores was noted between the 2 methods of repair. There was no significant difference between the groups in the cost of time in the operating theater, inpatient time, amount of postoperative analgesia, number of postoperative outpatient visits, physiotherapy costs, and time off work. The incremental cost of each arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was pound675 ($1248.75) more than the open procedure. This was mainly in the area of direct health care costs, instrumentation in particular.

DISCUSSION

Health care policy makers are increasingly demanding evidence of cost-effectiveness of a procedure. This study showed both methods of repair provide equivalent clinical results.

CONCLUSION

Open cuff repair is more cost-effective than arthroscopic repair and is likely to have lower cost-utility ratio. In addition, the tariff for the arthroscopic procedure in some health care systems is same as open repair.

摘要

背景

在日益注重成本的医疗保健环境下,新出现的昂贵新技术层出不穷,因此有必要对手术程序进行经济评估。本研究比较了开放性肩袖修复术与关节镜修复术治疗中等大小撕裂的成本效益。

材料与方法

这是一项前瞻性研究,共纳入 30 例连续患者,其中 15 例行关节镜修复术,15 例行开放性手术。采用牛津和康斯腾肩部评分评估临床疗效。成本由科室和医院财务数据估算。

结果

末次随访时,两种修复方法的牛津和康斯腾肩部评分无差异。两组在手术室时间、住院时间、术后镇痛量、术后门诊次数、物理治疗费用和停工时间方面无显著差异。与开放性手术相比,每例关节镜肩袖修复术的增量成本为 675 英镑(1248.75 美元)。这主要是在直接医疗成本方面,尤其是器械方面。

讨论

医疗保健政策制定者越来越要求提供程序成本效益的证据。本研究表明,两种修复方法均能提供等效的临床结果。

结论

开放性肩袖修复术比关节镜修复术更具成本效益,且可能具有更低的成本效用比。此外,在某些医疗保健系统中,关节镜手术的费用与开放性修复相同。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.开放式与关节镜下肩袖修复术的成本效益比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Mar;19(2):258-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
2
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [the UK Rotator Cuff Surgery (UKUFF) randomised trial].开放性与关节镜下肩袖修复术的临床疗效及成本效益[英国肩袖手术(UKUFF)随机试验]
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct;19(80):1-218. doi: 10.3310/hta19800.
3
A comparative study of surgical invasion in arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repair.关节镜下与开放修复肩袖手术侵袭性的比较研究
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Jul-Aug;18(4):596-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
4
Open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparative view of 96 cases.开放性与关节镜下肩袖修复术:96例病例的对比观察
Arthroscopy. 2005 May;21(5):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.01.002.
5
[Massive tears of rotator cuff - comparison of mini-open and arthroscopic techniques. Part 1. Mini-open technique].[肩袖巨大撕裂——小切口与关节镜技术的比较。第1部分。小切口技术]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006 Dec;73(6):387-93.
6
Total cost and operating room time comparison of rotator cuff repair techniques at low, intermediate, and high volume centers: mini-open versus all-arthroscopic.在低、中、高容量中心比较肩袖修复技术的总费用和手术室时间:微创与全关节镜。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jul;19(5):716-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.011. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
7
Costs, quality of life and cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic and open repair for rotator cuff tears: an economic evaluation alongside the UKUFF trial.肩袖撕裂的关节镜修复和开放修复的成本、生活质量及成本效益:一项与UKUFF试验同步进行的经济学评估
Bone Joint J. 2016 Dec;98-B(12):1648-1655. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B12.BJJ-2016-0121.R1.
8
[Arthroscopic-assisted mini-open rotator cuff repair].关节镜辅助下小切口肩袖修补术
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2002;36(1):1-6.
9
A randomized clinical trial comparing open to arthroscopic acromioplasty with mini-open rotator cuff repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: disease-specific quality of life outcome at an average 2-year follow-up.一项随机临床试验,比较开放性与关节镜下肩峰成形术联合小切口肩袖修补术治疗全层肩袖撕裂的效果:平均2年随访时的疾病特异性生活质量结果
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1043-51. doi: 10.1177/0363546508314409. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
10
Repair of the rotator cuff. Mini-open and arthroscopic repairs.肩袖修复。小切口开放修复和关节镜修复。
Clin Sports Med. 2000 Jan;19(1):77-99. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5919(05)70297-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of Operative Time in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.关节镜下肩袖修复术中手术时间的决定因素
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 27;12(5):1886. doi: 10.3390/jcm12051886.
2
Have Elbow Arthroscopy Hospitalizations Decreased over the Years? An Epidemiological Italian Study from 2001 to 2016.肘部关节镜检查住院治疗是否逐年减少?意大利 2001 年至 2016 年的一项流行病学研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 18;20(4):3638. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043638.
3
Increased Risk of Surgical-Site Infection and Need for Manipulation Under Anesthesia for Those Who Undergo Open Versus Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.
与接受关节镜下肩袖修复术的患者相比,接受开放性肩袖修复术的患者手术部位感染风险增加且需要在麻醉下进行手法操作。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Feb 5;4(2):e527-e533. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.11.012. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
The Relevance of Open Rotator Cuff Repair in 2021.2021年开放性肩袖修复的相关性
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Apr 7;55(2):433-442. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00345-7. eCollection 2021 Apr.
5
Clinical outcomes and cost-utility of rotator cuff repair surgery by open and arthroscopic techniques: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.经关节镜和开放手术修复肩袖撕裂的临床结果和成本-效用研究:一项随机临床试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 28;10(12):e043126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043126.
6
No difference in long-term outcome between open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized study.开放性与关节镜下肩袖修复术的长期疗效无差异:一项前瞻性随机研究。
JSES Int. 2020 Sep 18;4(4):818-825. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.08.005. eCollection 2020 Dec.
7
Costs, Complications, and Reoperations Associated With Primary Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With or Without Acromioplasty and/or Biceps Tenodesis.与原发性关节镜下肩袖修补术(伴或不伴肩峰成形术和/或肱二头肌固定术)相关的成本、并发症及再次手术情况。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Jul 29;2(4):e369-e376. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.05.010. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for treatment of infantile-onset Pompe disease (IOPD) in the Iranian pharmaceutical market.伊朗药品市场中用于治疗婴儿型庞贝病(IOPD)的酶替代疗法(ERT)的成本效益分析。
Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2020 Aug;9(3):130-136. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2020.03028.
9
Cost-Utility Analysis of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Prospective Health Economic Study Using Real-World Data.关节镜下肩袖修复术的成本-效用分析:一项使用真实世界数据的前瞻性卫生经济学研究。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020 Apr 25;2(3):e193-e205. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.02.001. eCollection 2020 Jun.
10
Trends Associated with Open Versus Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.与开放性与关节镜下肩袖修复相关的趋势
HSS J. 2019 Jul;15(2):133-136. doi: 10.1007/s11420-018-9628-2. Epub 2018 Aug 27.