Lin Shu-Min, Chung Fu-Tsai, Huang Chien-Da, Liu Wen-Te, Kuo Chih-Hsia, Wang Chun-Hua, Lee Kang-Yun, Liu Chien-Ying, Lin Horng-Chyuan, Kuo Han-Pin
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jul;138(1):179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.004.
We sought to compare the diagnostic yields of acid-fast bacilli smears and Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures in terms of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and histologic examination of transbronchial lung biopsy specimens for pulmonary tuberculosis by using bronchoscopy with versus without endobronchial ultrasonography in patients with negative acid-fast bacilli smears or no sputum production.
From June 2005 to July 2006, a total of 451 patients were given diagnoses of and treated for pulmonary tuberculosis in a university-affiliated hospital. Among them, 121 patients who received bronchoscopy because of sputum-negative conditions were recruited. Of these, 73 patients received bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasonography, and 48 patients received conventional bronchoscopy.
Patients who received bronchoscopy with endobronchial ultrasonography had higher diagnostic yields of acid-fast bacilli smears (31.5% vs 12.5%, P = .018) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, M tuberculosis in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (67.1% vs 47.9%, P = .024), and pathologic reports of tuberculosis in transbronchial lung biopsy specimens (32.9% vs 4.2%, P < .0001) than patients who received conventional bronchoscopy. With the aid of endobronchial ultrasonography, the overall diagnostic yield for tuberculosis by using bronchoscopic procedures (smears and cultures of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and transbronchial lung biopsy specimens) was higher (80.8%) than for those who did not undergo endobronchial ultrasonography (58.3%, P = .035).
The addition of endobronchial ultrasonography to diagnostic bronchoscopy increased the sensitivity for proving the presence of tuberculosis in a population of patients with negative acid-fast bacilli smears or no sputum production.
我们试图比较在耐酸杆菌涂片阴性或无痰的患者中,使用或不使用支气管内超声的支气管镜检查,支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)液中的耐酸杆菌涂片及结核分枝杆菌培养物,以及经支气管肺活检标本的组织学检查对肺结核的诊断率。
2005年6月至2006年7月,一所大学附属医院共有451例患者被诊断为肺结核并接受治疗。其中,121例因痰菌阴性接受支气管镜检查的患者被纳入研究。这些患者中,73例接受了支气管内超声引导下的支气管镜检查,48例接受了传统支气管镜检查。
接受支气管内超声引导下支气管镜检查的患者,其BAL液中耐酸杆菌涂片的诊断率(31.5%对12.5%,P = 0.018)、BAL液中结核分枝杆菌的诊断率(67.1%对47.9%,P = 0.024)以及经支气管肺活检标本中结核病的病理报告诊断率(32.9%对4.2%,P < 0.0001)均高于接受传统支气管镜检查的患者。借助支气管内超声,通过支气管镜检查程序(BAL液涂片和培养以及经支气管肺活检标本)对结核病的总体诊断率更高(80.8%),高于未接受支气管内超声检查的患者(58.3%,P = 0.035)。
在诊断性支气管镜检查中增加支气管内超声可提高在耐酸杆菌涂片阴性或无痰患者群体中证实结核病存在的敏感性。