Cruz Mauro, Wassall Thomaz, Toledo Elson Magalhães, da Silva Barra Luis Paulo, Cruz Silvia
Clinical Center of Research in Stomatology, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 May-Jun;24(3):391-403.
A three-dimensional finite element analysis was conducted to evaluate and compare the stress distribution around two prosthesis-implant systems, in which implants were arranged in either a straight-line or an intrabone offset configuration.
The systems were modeled with three titanium implants placed in the posterior mandible following a straight line along the bone. The straight system was built with three straight implants (no offset). The angled system was built as follows: the first implant (mesial) was an angled implant inclined lingually, the second (median) was straight, and the third (distal) was another angled implant inclined buccally. This buccal incline created an intrabone implant offset owing to the inclination of the angled implants' bodies. Each system received a metal-ceramic prosthesis with crowns that mimicked premolar anatomy. In both systems, an axial load of 100 N and a horizontal load of 20 N were applied on the center of the crown of the middle implant.
In both systems, the major von Mises stresses occurred with vertical loading on the mesial and the distal neck area of the first and third implants, respectively: 6.304 MPa on the first implant of the straight system and 6.173 MPa on the third implant in the angled system. The peak stress occurred for the minimum principal stress (S3) on the neck of the first implant for both systems at the level of -8.835 MPa for the straight system and -8.511 MPa for the angled system. There was no stress concentration on the inner or outer angles of the angled implants, on the notches along the implant body, or on any apex.
In this analysis, the angled system did not induce a stress concentration in any point around the implants that was different from that of the straight system. The stress distribution was very similar in both systems.
进行三维有限元分析,以评估和比较两种假体 - 种植体系统周围的应力分布,其中种植体呈直线排列或骨内偏移配置。
这些系统通过沿着下颌骨后部的骨按直线放置三个钛种植体进行建模。直线系统由三个直种植体(无偏移)构建而成。角度系统构建如下:第一个种植体(近中)是向舌侧倾斜的角度种植体,第二个(中间)是直的,第三个(远中)是另一个向颊侧倾斜的角度种植体。由于角度种植体的主体倾斜,这种颊侧倾斜在骨内产生了种植体偏移。每个系统都接受一个带有模仿前磨牙解剖结构冠部的金属陶瓷假体。在两个系统中,在中间种植体冠部中心施加100 N的轴向载荷和20 N的水平载荷。
在两个系统中,第一和第三个种植体近中和远中颈部区域分别在垂直加载时出现主要的冯·米塞斯应力:直线系统中第一个种植体上为6.304 MPa,角度系统中第三个种植体上为6.173 MPa。两个系统中,第一个种植体颈部最小主应力(S₃)出现峰值应力,直线系统为 -8.835 MPa,角度系统为 -8.511 MPa。在角度种植体的内角或外角、种植体主体上的切口或任何根尖处均未出现应力集中。
在此分析中,角度系统在种植体周围的任何点均未引起与直线系统不同的应力集中。两个系统中的应力分布非常相似。