Archer Kristin R, MacKenzie Ellen J, Bosse Michael J, Pollak Andrew N, Riley Lee H
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Medical Center East-South Tower, Ste 4200, Nashville, TN 37232 USA.
Phys Ther. 2009 Sep;89(9):893-905. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080321. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
Variation in referral rates for physical therapy exists at both the individual physician and practice levels.
The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of physician and practice characteristics on referral for physical therapy in patients with traumatic lower-extremity injury.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted.
In 2007, a Web-based survey questionnaire was distributed to 474 surgeon members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. The questionnaire measured physician and practice characteristics, outcome expectations, and attitude toward physical therapy. Referral for physical therapy was based on case vignettes.
The response rate was 58%. Surgeons reported that 57.6% of their patients would have a positive outcome from physical therapy and 24.2% would have a negative outcome. The highest physical therapy expectations were for the appropriate use of assistive devices (80.7%) and improved strength (force-generating capacity) (76.4%). The lowest outcome expectations were for improvements in pain (35.9%), coping with the emotional aspects of disability (44.1%), and improvements in workplace limitations (51.4%). Physicians reported that 32.6% of their patients referred for physical therapy would have no improvement beyond what would occur with a surgeon-directed home exercise program. Multivariate analyses showed positive physician outcome expectations to have the largest effect on referral for physical therapy (odds ratio=2.7, P<.001).
The results suggest that orthopedic trauma surgeons refer patients for physical therapy based mostly on expectations for physical and motor outcomes, but may not be considering pain relief, return to work, and psychosocial aspects of recovery. Furthermore, low referral rates may be attributed to a preference for surgeon-directed home-based rehabilitation. Future research should consider the efficacy of physical therapy for pain, psychosocial and occupational outcomes, and exploring the differences between supervised physical therapy and physician-directed home exercise programs.
物理治疗的转诊率在个体医生和医疗机构层面均存在差异。
本研究旨在探讨医生和医疗机构特征对创伤性下肢损伤患者物理治疗转诊的影响。
开展了一项横断面调查。
2007年,向骨科创伤协会的474名外科医生会员发放了一份基于网络的调查问卷。该问卷测量了医生和医疗机构特征、结果期望以及对物理治疗的态度。物理治疗转诊基于病例 vignettes。
回复率为58%。外科医生报告称,其57.6%的患者接受物理治疗会有积极结果,24.2%会有消极结果。对物理治疗的最高期望是辅助设备的恰当使用(80.7%)和力量增强(力产生能力)(76.4%)。最低的结果期望是疼痛改善(35.9%)、应对残疾的情绪方面(44.1%)以及工作场所限制的改善(51.4%)。医生报告称,其转诊接受物理治疗的患者中,32.6%不会有超出外科医生指导的家庭锻炼计划所能达到的改善。多变量分析显示,医生的积极结果期望对物理治疗转诊的影响最大(优势比=2.7,P<.001)。
结果表明,骨科创伤外科医生转诊患者接受物理治疗主要基于对身体和运动结果的期望,但可能未考虑疼痛缓解、重返工作岗位以及恢复的心理社会方面。此外,低转诊率可能归因于对外科医生指导的家庭康复的偏好。未来研究应考虑物理治疗对疼痛、心理社会和职业结果的疗效,并探索监督下的物理治疗与医生指导的家庭锻炼计划之间的差异。