Hoet Peter, Legiest Barbara, Geys Jorina, Nemery Benoit
K.U. Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health Occupational, Environmental & Insurance Medicine, Laboratorium voor Pneumologie (Longtoxicologie), B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Drug Saf. 2009;32(8):625-36. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200932080-00002.
Nanomaterials have different chemical, physical and biological characteristics than larger materials of the same chemical composition. These differences give nanotechnology a double identity: their use implies novel and interesting medical and/or industrial applications but also potential danger for human and environmental health. Here, we briefly review the most important types of nanomaterials, the difficulties in assessing safety or toxicity, and describe existing test protocols used in nanomaterial safety evaluation. In general, the big challenge of nanotechnology, particularly for nanomedicine (nano-bioengineering), is to understand which nano-specific characteristics interact with particular biological systems and functions in order to optimize the therapeutic potential and reduce the undesired responses. The evaluation of the safety of medicinal nanomaterials, especially for long-term application, is an important challenge for the near future. At present, it is still too early to predict, on the basis of the characteristics of the nanomaterial, a possible biological response because no reliable database exists. Therefore, a case-by-case approach for hazard identification is still required, so it is difficult to establish a risk assessment framework.
与具有相同化学组成的较大材料相比,纳米材料具有不同的化学、物理和生物学特性。这些差异赋予了纳米技术双重特性:其应用意味着新颖且有趣的医学和/或工业应用,但同时也对人类健康和环境健康存在潜在危险。在此,我们简要回顾纳米材料的最重要类型、评估安全性或毒性的困难,并描述纳米材料安全性评估中使用的现有测试方案。总体而言,纳米技术面临的重大挑战,尤其是对于纳米医学(纳米生物工程)而言,是要了解哪些纳米特异性特征与特定生物系统和功能相互作用,以便优化治疗潜力并减少不良反应。药用纳米材料的安全性评估,尤其是长期应用的安全性评估,是近期的一项重要挑战。目前,基于纳米材料的特性预测可能的生物学反应仍为时过早,因为不存在可靠的数据库。因此,仍需要逐案进行危害识别,所以难以建立风险评估框架。