Suppr超能文献

电视辅助胸腔镜手术行肺大部切除术时需要控制主肺动脉。

Video-assisted thoracic surgery major pulmonary resection requiring control of the main pulmonary artery.

作者信息

Nakanishi Ryoichi, Oka Soichi, Odate Seiichi

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shin-Kokura Hospital, Federation of National Public Service Personnel Mutual Aid Associations, 1-3-1 Kanada, Kokurakita-ku, Kitakyusyu 803-8505, Japan.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009 Oct;9(4):618-22. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.210310. Epub 2009 Jul 14.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility and safety of thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection requiring the cross-clamping of the main pulmonary artery (PA), in comparison to an open thoracotomy performed in patients with lung cancer. A retrospective database of 27 consecutive lung cancer patients, who underwent either video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) (n=13) or open thoracotomy (n=14) for a major pulmonary resection using these procedures, was analyzed regarding the demographic, perioperative, histopathologic, and outcome variables. The thoracoscopic procedures were successfully performed in 12 of 13 patients (92.3%). Two groups showed no differences in the demographic, perioperative, histopathologic and staging variables. Both groups presented with no mortality. The VATS group showed better results regarding the length of epidural anesthesia (P=0.0066), additional analgesic requirements (P=0.0009), and morbidity (P=0.0213) than the open thoracotomy group. Despite the short follow-up time, the two groups were comparable regarding both the recurrence and survival rates. The results indicate that VATS is feasible and safe for selected lung cancer patients requiring the cross-clamping of the main PA, with acceptable perioperative results in comparison to an open thoracotomy.

摘要

本研究的目的是,与对肺癌患者实施的开胸手术相比,探讨对主肺动脉(PA)进行交叉钳夹的胸腔镜下肺大部切除术的可行性和安全性。分析了27例连续肺癌患者的回顾性数据库,这些患者接受了电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)(n = 13)或开胸手术(n = 14),采用这些手术方法进行肺大部切除术,分析了人口统计学、围手术期、组织病理学和结局变量。13例患者中有12例(92.3%)成功完成了胸腔镜手术。两组在人口统计学、围手术期、组织病理学和分期变量方面无差异。两组均无死亡病例。VATS组在硬膜外麻醉时间(P = 0.0066)、额外镇痛需求(P = 0.0009)和发病率(P = 0.0213)方面比开胸手术组表现更好。尽管随访时间较短,但两组在复发率和生存率方面具有可比性。结果表明,对于需要对主肺动脉进行交叉钳夹的特定肺癌患者,VATS是可行且安全的,与开胸手术相比,围手术期结果可接受。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验