Suppr超能文献

与正畸支抗微型种植体稳定性相关的因素:台湾地区414例样本的研究

Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.

作者信息

Wu Tzu-Ying, Kuang Shou-Hsin, Wu Cheng-Hsien

机构信息

Section of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Stomatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, School of Dentistry, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Aug;67(8):1595-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.015.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate failure rates and factors associated with the stability of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 166 patients (35 male patients and 131 female patients) who had consecutively received mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage at the Section of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan) from January 2001 to December 2006. A total of 414 mini-implants with diameters ranging from 1.2 to 2.0 mm were evaluated. Clinical variables for analysis were divided into host-related and implant-related factors. Mini-implants that could be maintained for orthodontic anchorage for more than 6 months were considered to be successful. Statistical analysis was used to evaluate the failure rate in our study cohort and to identify possible associated factors.

RESULTS

The overall failure rate was 10.1% (42 of 414 screws) with orthodontic force loading for more than 6 months. Most failures were due to loosening and occurred within the first 2 weeks. Differences in overall failure rates for the maxilla and mandible (9.3% and 16.3%, respectively) were not statistically significant. A lower failure rate was found for the maxilla with implant diameters equal to or less than 1.4 mm (P = .036). The left side had a lower failure rate than the right (6.7% vs 13.9%, P = .019). Length and type of mini-implants, age, and gender were not associated with mini-implant failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of mini-implants for anchorage is reliable. In our study the overall success rate was 89.9%. Careful diameter selection for different locations is essential. In the maxilla an implant diameter equal to or less than 1.4 mm is recommended. In the mandible an implant diameter larger than 1.4 mm is suggested for better orthodontic anchorage. Hygienic care of implantation sites should also be emphasized for long-term success of mini-implant anchorage.

摘要

目的

评估用于正畸支抗的微型种植体的失败率及与稳定性相关的因素。

患者与方法

我们纳入了2001年1月至2006年12月期间在台湾台北荣民总医院正畸与儿童牙科接受微型种植体正畸支抗治疗的166例患者(男性35例,女性131例)。共评估了414枚直径为1.2至2.0毫米的微型种植体。分析的临床变量分为宿主相关因素和种植体相关因素。能够维持正畸支抗超过6个月的微型种植体被视为成功。采用统计学分析评估我们研究队列中的失败率,并确定可能的相关因素。

结果

在正畸力加载超过6个月的情况下,总体失败率为10.1%(414枚螺钉中有42枚)。大多数失败是由于松动,且发生在最初2周内。上颌和下颌的总体失败率差异(分别为9.3%和16.3%)无统计学意义。种植体直径等于或小于1.4毫米的上颌骨失败率较低(P = 0.036)。左侧的失败率低于右侧(6.7%对13.9%,P = 0.019)。微型种植体的长度和类型、年龄及性别与微型种植体失败无关。

结论

使用微型种植体作为支抗是可靠的。在我们的研究中,总体成功率为89.9%。针对不同部位仔细选择种植体直径至关重要。在上颌,建议种植体直径等于或小于1.4毫米。在下颌,建议使用直径大于1.4毫米的种植体以获得更好的正畸支抗。为实现微型种植体支抗的长期成功,还应强调种植部位的卫生护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验