Kieser J A, Groeneveld H T
Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1991 May;46(5):267-70.
The present analysis addressed the reliability of human dental mensuration, with special reference to intra- and inter-observer error, the effect of time and of tooth type. Two observers were asked to measure the same 35 incisors, premolars and molars, using the same mensurational technique and the same instrumentation. Standard mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) measurements were repeated on the next day and after six months. Measurement error was evaluated by means of Pearsonian correlation coefficients, mean absolute error, the Bland-Altman procedure, percentage error and an analysis of variance. It was concluded that human dental mensuration is subject to a large error component which is more marked in the MD than in the BL dimension, higher in the anterior than the postcanine teeth and greater between than within observers. These error components were shown to be random rather than systematic.
本分析探讨了人体牙齿测量的可靠性,特别涉及观察者内和观察者间误差、时间及牙齿类型的影响。两名观察者被要求使用相同的测量技术和仪器,对相同的35颗切牙、前磨牙和磨牙进行测量。次日及六个月后重复进行标准的近远中(MD)和颊舌径(BL)测量。通过Pearson相关系数、平均绝对误差、Bland-Altman法、百分比误差和方差分析来评估测量误差。得出的结论是,人体牙齿测量存在较大的误差成分,在MD维度比在BL维度更明显,在前牙比犬后牙更高,观察者之间的误差大于观察者内部的误差。这些误差成分显示为随机而非系统性的。