Bollapragada S S, MacKenzie F, Norrie J D, Eddama O, Petrou S, Reid M, Norman J E
Maternal and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Developmental Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
BJOG. 2009 Aug;116(9):1185-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02216.x.
To determine whether isosorbide mononitrate (IMN), self-administered vaginally by women at home, improves the process of induction of labour.
Randomised double blind placebo-controlled trial.
Large UK maternity hospital.
Nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation > or = 37 weeks gestation, requiring cervical ripening prior to induction of labour.
IMN (n = 177) or placebo (n = 173) self-administered vaginally at home at 48, 32 and 16 hours prior to the scheduled time of admission for induction.
Admission to delivery interval and women's experience of induction of labour.
IMN did not shorten the admission to delivery interval as compared with placebo [mean difference of -1.6 hours (95% CI -5.1,1.9, P = 0.37)], despite being more effective than placebo in inducing a change in Bishop score [mean difference of 0.65 (95% CI 0.14,1.17, P = 0.013)]. While both groups found the overall experience of home treatment to be positive, (mean score of 3.8/10 +/- 2.3/10 for the IMN group, where 1 = extremely good and 10 = not at all good) women in the placebo group found it marginally more positive than those in the IMN group (just over half a unit on a 10-point scale, P = 0.043). There were no differences between the groups in the pain or anxiety experienced or willingness to take the treatment in a subsequent pregnancy.
IMN self-administered vaginally at home does not shorten admission to delivery interval despite a significant effect on cervical ripeness assessed using the Bishop score. However, women report positive views on cervical ripening at home, and the setting deserves further investigation.
确定在家自行经阴道使用单硝酸异山梨酯(IMN)是否能改善引产过程。
随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
英国大型妇产医院。
单胎妊娠、头先露、孕周≥37周且引产前行宫颈成熟的初产妇。
在预定引产入院时间前48、32和16小时在家自行经阴道使用IMN(n = 177)或安慰剂(n = 173)。
入院至分娩间隔时间以及女性的引产体验。
与安慰剂相比,IMN并未缩短入院至分娩间隔时间[平均差值为 -1.6小时(95%可信区间 -5.1,1.9,P = 0.37)],尽管在诱导Bishop评分变化方面比安慰剂更有效[平均差值为0.65(95%可信区间0.14,1.17,P = 0.013)]。虽然两组都认为在家治疗的总体体验是积极的(IMN组平均评分为3.8/10 ± 2.3/10,其中1 = 非常好,10 = 一点都不好),但安慰剂组女性认为其比IMN组略更积极(在10分制上高出半分多一点,P = 0.043)。两组在经历的疼痛或焦虑以及后续妊娠中接受该治疗的意愿方面没有差异。
在家自行经阴道使用IMN尽管对用Bishop评分评估的宫颈成熟有显著影响,但并未缩短入院至分娩间隔时间。然而,女性对在家进行宫颈成熟报告了积极的看法,该情况值得进一步研究。