McHutchison John G, Lawitz Eric J, Shiffman Mitchell L, Muir Andrew J, Galler Greg W, McCone Jonathan, Nyberg Lisa M, Lee William M, Ghalib Reem H, Schiff Eugene R, Galati Joseph S, Bacon Bruce R, Davis Mitchell N, Mukhopadhyay Pabak, Koury Kenneth, Noviello Stephanie, Pedicone Lisa D, Brass Clifford A, Albrecht Janice K, Sulkowski Mark S
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27715, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 6;361(6):580-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808010. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
Treatment guidelines recommend the use of peginterferon alfa-2b or peginterferon alfa-2a in combination with ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, these regimens have not been adequately compared.
At 118 sites, patients who had HCV genotype 1 infection and who had not previously been treated were randomly assigned to undergo 48 weeks of treatment with one of three regimens: peginterferon alfa-2b at a standard dose of 1.5 microg per kilogram of body weight per week or a low dose of 1.0 microg per kilogram per week, plus ribavirin at a dose of 800 to 1400 mg per day, or peginterferon alfa-2a at a dose of 180 microg per week plus ribavirin at a dose of 1000 to 1200 mg per day. We compared the rate of sustained virologic response and the safety and adverse-event profiles between the peginterferon alfa-2b regimens and between the standard-dose peginterferon alfa-2b regimen and the peginterferon alfa-2a regimen.
Among 3070 patients, rates of sustained virologic response were similar among the regimens: 39.8% with standard-dose peginterferon alfa-2b, 38.0% with low-dose peginterferon alfa-2b, and 40.9% with peginterferon alfa-2a (P=0.20 for standard-dose vs. low-dose peginterferon alfa-2b; P=0.57 for standard-dose peginterferon alfa-2b vs. peginterferon alfa-2a). Estimated differences in response rates were 1.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], -2.3 to 6.0) between standard-dose and low-dose peginterferon alfa-2b and -1.1% (95% CI, -5.3 to 3.0) between standard-dose peginterferon alfa-2b and peginterferon alfa-2a. Relapse rates were 23.5% (95% CI, 19.9 to 27.2) for standard-dose peginterferon alfa-2b, 20.0% (95% CI, 16.4 to 23.6) for low-dose peginterferon alfa-2b, and 31.5% (95% CI, 27.9 to 35.2) for peginterferon alfa-2a. The safety profile was similar among the three groups; serious adverse events were observed in 8.6 to 11.7% of patients. Among the patients with undetectable HCV RNA levels at treatment weeks 4 and 12, a sustained virologic response was achieved in 86.2% and 78.7%, respectively.
In patients infected with HCV genotype 1, the rates of sustained virologic response and tolerability did not differ significantly between the two available peginterferon-ribavirin regimens or between the two doses of peginterferon alfa-2b. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00081770.)
治疗指南推荐使用聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b或聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a联合利巴韦林治疗慢性丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染。然而,这些治疗方案尚未得到充分比较。
在118个地点,将HCV基因1型感染且既往未接受过治疗的患者随机分配,接受三种治疗方案之一,为期48周:标准剂量为每周每千克体重1.5微克的聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b或低剂量为每周每千克体重1.0微克的聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b,加每日剂量为800至1400毫克的利巴韦林,或每周剂量为180微克的聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a加每日剂量为1000至1200毫克的利巴韦林。我们比较了聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b治疗方案之间以及标准剂量聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b治疗方案与聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a治疗方案之间的持续病毒学应答率、安全性和不良事件情况。
在3070例患者中,各治疗方案的持续病毒学应答率相似:标准剂量聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b为39.8%,低剂量聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b为38.0%,聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a为40.9%(标准剂量与低剂量聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b相比,P = 0.20;标准剂量聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b与聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a相比,P = 0.57)。标准剂量与低剂量聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b之间应答率的估计差异为1.8%(95%置信区间[CI],-2.3至6.0),标准剂量聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b与聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a之间应答率的估计差异为-1.1%(95%CI,-5.3至3.0)。标准剂量聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b的复发率为23.5%(95%CI,19.9至27.2),低剂量聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b的复发率为20.0%(95%CI,16.4至23.6),聚乙二醇干扰素α-2a的复发率为31.5%(95%CI,27.9至35.2)。三组的安全性情况相似;8.6%至11.7%的患者发生严重不良事件。在治疗第4周和第12周HCV RNA水平检测不到的患者中,分别有86.2%和78.7%实现了持续病毒学应答。
在HCV基因1型感染患者中,两种可用的聚乙二醇干扰素 - 利巴韦林治疗方案之间或两种剂量的聚乙二醇干扰素α-2b之间,持续病毒学应答率和耐受性无显著差异。(临床试验.gov编号,NCT00081770。)