Salavert Miguel, Bastida Guillermo, Pemán Javier, Nos Pilar
Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, España.
Rev Iberoam Micol. 2009 Sep 30;26(3):213-7. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Jul 26.
The biological therapies for chronic inflammatory diseases of autoimmune origin, particularly drugs inhibiting cytokines, such as the antagonists of the tumoral necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), are acceptably well tolerated in patients suffering rheumatologic, dermatologic and gastrointestinal pathologies. Nevertheless, pharmacologic vigilance studies have clarified several aspects of their security in daily clinical use. The adverse effects associated with inhibitors of TNFalpha can be related to the target (or class) and to the agent. The adverse effects related to the target include those potentially attributable to the inherent immunosuppressive state due to the blockade of the main cytokine, phenomenon that could increase the susceptibility to the infections and cancer.
To expound the potential risk of serious infections, opportunistic or not, inherent to the use of biological therapies and, specifically, antagonistic drugs of TNFalpha, from the description of a case of invasive fungal infection.
Revision of clinical records, obtained from the chronic inflammatory disease of autoimmune origin patient database, candidates or recipients of the new biological therapies, and study of the microbiological isolates.
A case of dual opportunistic infection (nocardiosis and aspergillosis) with a difficult diagnosis and complex management in an immunosupressed patient with Crohn's disease, triggered off after the administration of infliximab (monoclonal antibody anti-TNFalpha) is presented.
Invasive fungal infections, with isolated or associated clinical presentation to other opportunistic infections, are emerging in new groups-at-risk as they are the recipients of anti-cytokine biological therapies, regulators of inflammation and immunity. They can be potentially serious in their evolution and a high index of suspicion is needed sometimes for their prompt diagnosis. Possible preventive measures in patients with a high risk of suffering them will have to be investigated.
针对自身免疫性起源的慢性炎症性疾病的生物疗法,尤其是抑制细胞因子的药物,如肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα)拮抗剂,在患有风湿性、皮肤病学和胃肠道疾病的患者中耐受性良好。然而,药物警戒研究已经阐明了它们在日常临床使用中的安全性的几个方面。与TNFα抑制剂相关的不良反应可能与靶点(或类别)和药物有关。与靶点相关的不良反应包括那些可能归因于由于主要细胞因子的阻断而导致的固有免疫抑制状态的不良反应,这种现象可能会增加对感染和癌症的易感性。
通过描述一例侵袭性真菌感染病例,阐述生物疗法尤其是TNFα拮抗剂使用中固有的严重感染(无论是否为机会性感染)的潜在风险。
从自身免疫性起源的慢性炎症性疾病患者数据库中获取临床记录,这些患者是新生物疗法的候选者或接受者,并对微生物分离株进行研究。
呈现了一例患有克罗恩病的免疫抑制患者在使用英夫利昔单抗(抗TNFα单克隆抗体)后引发的双重机会性感染(诺卡菌病和曲霉病)病例,该病例诊断困难且管理复杂。
侵袭性真菌感染,无论是单独出现还是与其他机会性感染相关出现,在新的高危人群中正在出现,这些人群是抗细胞因子生物疗法(炎症和免疫调节剂)的接受者。它们在病程中可能具有潜在严重性,有时需要高度怀疑才能及时诊断。对于有高感染风险的患者,可能的预防措施必须进行研究。