Lanzman Rotem S, Voiculescu Adina, Walther Clemens, Ringelstein Adrian, Bi Xiaoming, Schmitt Peter, Freitag Sonja-Marie, Won Sora, Scherer Axel, Blondin Dirk
Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Moorenstr 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Radiology. 2009 Sep;252(3):914-21. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2531082260.
To evaluate noncontrast material-enhanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography in the assessment of transplant renal arteries (RAs) by using digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.
This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board; written informed consent was obtained from all participants. In 20 renal allograft recipients scheduled for DSA, the transplant RAs were assessed with electrocardiographically gated nonenhanced SSFP MR angiography performed at 1.5 T; the degree of stenosis was compared with that of DSA. Subjective image quality for SSFP MR angiography was assessed independently by two radiologists on a four-point scale (from 1, nondiagnostic to 4, excellent) in four predefined segments (I, the iliac artery; II, the main transplant artery; III, segmental branches; and IV, parenchymal branches). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SSFP MR angiography for the detection of relevant (> or =50%) transplant RA stenosis (TRAS) were calculated on a per-artery basis.
One patient was excluded because SSFP MR angiography failed to adequately visualize the allograft vasculature owing to low cardiac output. The mean image quality assessed by both readers was 3.98 +/- 0.16 (standard deviation), 3.5 +/- 0.68, 2.71 +/- 1.12 and 2.03 +/- 1.09 for segments I, II, III, and IV, respectively (kappa = 0.80). DSA helped identify eight relevant (> or =50%) stenoses in six transplant RAs. Kinking of the transplant artery without relevant stenosis was found in seven patients. The degree of stenosis was overestimated in three patients by using SSFP MR angiography. As compared with DSA, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SSFP MR angiography to help detect relevant TRAS were 100% (six of six), 88% (14 of 16), and 91% (20 of 22), respectively.
Nonenhanced SSFP MR angiography is a reliable alternative imaging technique for the assessment of transplant RAs in patients for whom contrast-enhanced MR angiography is contraindicated.
以数字减影血管造影(DSA)作为参考标准,评估非对比剂增强稳态自由进动(SSFP)磁共振(MR)血管造影在移植肾动脉(RA)评估中的应用。
本前瞻性研究经机构审查委员会批准;所有参与者均签署了书面知情同意书。对20例计划行DSA的肾移植受者,采用1.5T心电门控非增强SSFP MR血管造影评估移植肾动脉;将狭窄程度与DSA结果进行比较。两位放射科医生独立对SSFP MR血管造影的主观图像质量按四分制(从1分,无法诊断到4分,优秀)在四个预定义节段(I,髂动脉;II,移植主动脉;III,节段分支;IV,实质分支)进行评估。基于每条动脉计算SSFP MR血管造影检测相关(≥50%)移植肾动脉狭窄(TRAS)的敏感性、特异性和准确性。
1例患者因心输出量低导致SSFP MR血管造影未能充分显示移植肾血管系统而被排除。两位阅片者评估的I、II、III和IV节段的平均图像质量分别为3.98±0.16(标准差)、3.5±0.68、2.71±1.12和2.03±1.09(kappa = 0.80)。DSA发现6例移植肾动脉中有8处相关(≥50%)狭窄。7例患者发现移植动脉扭曲但无相关狭窄。3例患者使用SSFP MR血管造影时狭窄程度被高估。与DSA相比,SSFP MR血管造影检测相关TRAS的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为100%(6/6)、88%(14/16)和91%(20/22)。
对于禁忌使用对比剂增强MR血管造影的患者,非增强SSFP MR血管造影是评估移植肾动脉可靠的替代成像技术。