Koutayas Spiridon-Oumvertos, Charisis Dimitrios
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Albert-Ludwig University, Freiburg, Germany.
Eur J Esthet Dent. 2008 Summer;3(2):160-73.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the core material (Spinell or Alumina) and the glass infiltration mode (under or without vacuum) on the color of 2M2 Vita In-Ceram Spinell and Alumina ceramic veneers (Vident) for the restoration of 5M1 discolored backgrounds. A total of 40 In-Ceram Spinell (SP, n = 20) and Alumina (AL, n = 20) disks (diameter 10.0 mm, thickness 0.4 mm, Vident) were glass-infiltrated under (V, n = 20) or without vacuum (A, n = 20) using a translucent glass (S1, Vident) and then veneered (2M2 Vitadur Alpha, total thickness 0.7 mm). The veneer specimens were bonded onto the 5M1 color backgrounds (Vitadur Alpha, diameter 10.0 mm, thickness 2.0 mm) using a dual curing adhesive cement (Panavia F 2.0 Light, Kuraray), to create the study groups (SPV, SPA, ALV, ALA, each n = 10). Ten 2M2 feldspathic veneer disks (Vitadur Alpha, diameter 10.0 mm, thickness 0.7 mm) bonded onto 2M2 color backgrounds (Vitadur Alpha, diameter 10.0 mm, thickness 2.0 mm) were used as control (CTR group). Lab* color coordinates were measured 5 times for each study group and control specimen using a Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer (Vident). Mean color differences (DeltaE) were calculated using the equation DeltaE = (DeltaL2 + Deltaa2 + Deltab*2)1/2. Mean color differences and standard deviations between each study group and the control group were: 7.31 +/- 0.99 for SPV; 7.23 +/- 0.61 for SPA; 5.81 +/- 1.41 for ALV; and 6.25 +/- 0.89 for ALA. Two-way ANOVA followed by t test showed that only the core material had a statistically significant effect on the final color performance (alpha = .05, P = .000). The core material (Spinell or Alumina) significantly influenced the core-related opacity, while the glass infiltration mode (under or without vacuum) had a minor effect on the final color establishment of both glass-infiltrated veneers over discolored backgrounds. Regarding the reported clinical visible thresholds, In-Ceram Alumina ceramic veneers showed the greatest improvement in the color performance of discolored teeth compared with all other groups.
本研究的目的是评估核心材料(尖晶石或氧化铝)和玻璃渗透方式(真空或非真空)对用于修复5M1变色基牙的2M2维他全瓷尖晶石和氧化铝陶瓷贴面(Vident)颜色的影响。总共40个全瓷尖晶石(SP,n = 20)和氧化铝(AL,n = 20)圆盘(直径10.0 mm,厚度0.4 mm,Vident)使用半透明玻璃(S1,Vident)在真空(V,n = 20)或非真空(A,n = 20)条件下进行玻璃渗透,然后进行贴面(2M2维他杜尔阿尔法,总厚度0.7 mm)。使用双固化粘结剂(帕纳维亚F 2.0光固化型,可乐丽)将贴面标本粘结到5M1颜色基牙(维他杜尔阿尔法,直径10.0 mm,厚度2.0 mm)上,以创建研究组(SPV、SPA、ALV、ALA,每组n = 10)。将10个粘结到2M2颜色基牙(维他杜尔阿尔法,直径10.0 mm,厚度2.0 mm)上的2M2长石质贴面圆盘(维他杜尔阿尔法,直径10.0 mm,厚度0.7 mm)用作对照(CTR组)。使用维他易彩分光光度计(Vident)对每个研究组和对照标本的Lab颜色坐标进行5次测量。使用公式ΔE = (ΔL2 + Δa2 + Δb2)1/2计算平均颜色差异(ΔE)。每个研究组与对照组之间的平均颜色差异和标准差分别为:SPV组7.31±0.99;SPA组7.23±0.61;ALV组5.81±1.41;ALA组6.25±0.89。双向方差分析后进行t检验表明,只有核心材料对最终颜色表现具有统计学显著影响(α = 0.05,P = 0.000)。核心材料(尖晶石或氧化铝)对与核心相关的不透明度有显著影响,而玻璃渗透方式(真空或非真空)对两种玻璃渗透贴面在变色基牙上的最终颜色形成影响较小。关于所报道的临床可见阈值,与所有其他组相比,全瓷氧化铝陶瓷贴面在变色牙的颜色表现方面改善最大。