Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Dr Negrín Gran Canaria University Hospital, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Feb;139(2):405-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.05.011. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
We sought to compare the long-term effects of conventional and simplified thoracic sympathectomy on cardiopulmonary function.
We performed a prospective and randomized study of 32 patients with diagnoses of primary hyperhidrosis who were candidates for either conventional or simplified thoracic sympathectomy. Patients were randomized according to the type of procedure: conventional thoracic sympathectomy (18 patients) and simplified thoracic sympathectomy (14 patients). Before surgical intervention, forced spirometry, body plethysmography, measurement of the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and exercise tests were carried out in all patients. These evaluations were performed again 1 year after the procedure to assess the long-term effects of sympathectomy.
Lung function tests revealed a significant decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF(25%-75%)) in both groups (FEV(1) of -6.3% and FEF(25%-75%) of -9.1% in the conventional thoracic sympathectomy group and FEV(1) of -3.5% and FEF(25%-75%) of -12.3% in the simplified thoracic sympathectomy group). DLCO and heart rate at rest and maximal values after exercise were also significantly reduced in both groups (DLCO of -4.2%, DLCO corrected by alveolar volume of -6.1%, resting heart rate of -11.8 beats/min, and maximal heart rate of -9.5 beats/min in the conventional thoracic sympathectomy group and DLCO of -3.9%, DLCO corrected by alveolar volume of -5.2%, resting heart rate of -10.7 beats/min, and maximal heart rate of -17.6 beats/min in the simplified thoracic sympathectomy group). Airway resistance increased significantly in the group of patients undergoing conventional thoracic sympathectomy (+13%). Despite all these changes, the patients remained asymptomatic. No significant differences were found between the conventional and simplified thoracic sympathectomy groups.
Simplified and conventional thoracic sympathectomy resulted in a long-term reduction in FEV(1), FEF(25%-75%), DLCO, and resting and maximal heart rate, as well as a mild but significant increase in airway resistance in the conventional thoracic sympathectomy group, without any clinical consequence to the patient. These changes were unrelated to the level of transection of the thoracic sympathetic chain.
比较传统和简化型胸交感神经切断术对心肺功能的长期影响。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机研究,共纳入 32 例原发性多汗症患者,这些患者均为传统或简化型胸交感神经切断术的候选者。根据手术类型将患者随机分组:传统胸交感神经切断术(18 例)和简化胸交感神经切断术(14 例)。所有患者均在手术前进行了用力肺活量、体描法、一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)测定以及运动试验。术后 1 年进行这些评估,以评估交感神经切断术的长期效果。
肺功能检查显示,两组患者用力呼气量第 1 秒(FEV1)和用力呼气量 25%至 75%肺活量时的流量(FEF25%-75%)均显著下降(传统胸交感神经切断术组 FEV1 下降 6.3%,FEF25%-75%下降 9.1%;简化胸交感神经切断术组 FEV1 下降 3.5%,FEF25%-75%下降 12.3%)。两组患者的 DLCO 和静息及运动后最大心率也均显著下降(传统胸交感神经切断术组 DLCO 下降 4.2%,肺泡容积校正的 DLCO 下降 6.1%,静息心率下降 11.8 次/分,最大心率下降 9.5 次/分;简化胸交感神经切断术组 DLCO 下降 3.9%,肺泡容积校正的 DLCO 下降 5.2%,静息心率下降 10.7 次/分,最大心率下降 17.6 次/分)。传统胸交感神经切断术组的气道阻力显著增加(增加 13%)。尽管存在这些变化,患者仍无症状。传统胸交感神经切断术组和简化胸交感神经切断术组之间无显著差异。
简化型和传统型胸交感神经切断术均导致 FEV1、FEF25%-75%、DLCO、静息和最大心率长期下降,且传统胸交感神经切断术组的气道阻力轻度但显著增加,但对患者无临床影响。这些变化与胸交感神经链切断的水平无关。