Sano Akihiko, Sakurai Shinji, Kato Hiroyuki, Sakai Makoto, Tanaka Naritaka, Inose Takanori, Saito Kana, Sohda Makoto, Nakajima Masanobu, Sakamoto Kazuha, Sano Takaaki, Hosoya Yoshinori, Enomoto Takehiko, Kanda Tatsuo, Ajioka Yoichi, Oyama Tetsunari, Kuwano Hiroyuki
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan.
Anticancer Res. 2009 Aug;29(8):3375-80.
Esophageal carcinosarcoma is a very rare neoplasm and its clinicopathological characteristics and the prognostic factors that influence the clinical outcome of the patient remain a matter of controversy.
Twenty patients with esophageal carcinosarcoma were referred to our institutions. Tissue blocks were reviewed and sections containing both carcinomatous and sarcomatous components were stained for epithelial and mesenchymal markers and a proliferating cell marker. The prognosis of the esophageal carcinosarcoma patients was compared with 142 cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
In the carcinomatous component, the expression of cytokeratin, epithelial membrane antigen, vimentin, smooth muscle actin, and S100 were detected in 20, 20, 1, 1, and 1 case, respectively, whereas in the sarcomatous component, expression of these were detected in 4, 2, 18, 15, and 3 cases, respectively. The Ki-67 labeling index of carcinomatous and sarcomatous components was 35.5% and 41.8%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was not statistically different between squamous cell carcinoma and carcinosarcoma (p=0.219). However, for T1 cases only, carcinosarcoma patients had statistically poorer prognosis than did squamous cell carcinoma patients (p=0.008).
The sarcomatous component shows various histological and immunohistochemical forms. In comparison with squamous cell carcinoma patients, carcinosarcoma patients had poorer prognosis amongst the T1 cases. For the treatment of esophageal carcinosarcoma, it is important to monitor lymph nodes and be watchful for hematogenous metastasis, as in cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
食管癌肉瘤是一种非常罕见的肿瘤,其临床病理特征以及影响患者临床结局的预后因素仍存在争议。
20例食管癌肉瘤患者被转诊至我们的机构。回顾组织块,对包含癌性和肉瘤性成分的切片进行上皮和间充质标志物以及增殖细胞标志物染色。将食管癌肉瘤患者的预后与142例食管鳞状细胞癌患者进行比较。
在癌性成分中,细胞角蛋白、上皮膜抗原、波形蛋白、平滑肌肌动蛋白和S100的表达分别在20例、20例、1例、1例和1例中检测到,而在肉瘤性成分中,这些标志物的表达分别在4例、2例、18例、15例和3例中检测到。癌性和肉瘤性成分的Ki-67标记指数分别为35.5%和41.8%。鳞状细胞癌和癌肉瘤的5年生存率无统计学差异(p=0.219)。然而,仅对于T1期病例,癌肉瘤患者的预后在统计学上比鳞状细胞癌患者差(p=0.008)。
肉瘤性成分表现出多种组织学和免疫组化形式。与鳞状细胞癌患者相比,癌肉瘤患者在T1期病例中的预后较差。对于食管癌肉瘤的治疗,如同食管鳞状细胞癌一样,监测淋巴结并警惕血行转移很重要。