Frick Anna C, Paraiso Marie Fidela R
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;52(3):390-400. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181b0bf69.
Laparoscopy provides an enticing alternative for incontinence and pelvic floor procedures that would otherwise require a laparotomy or that would be difficult vaginally. Despite some data suggesting lower cure rates with the laparoscopic Burch when compared with the open approach or trans-vaginal tape, the safety and relative efficacy of the laparoscopic procedure support its continued use. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy seems to yield comparable outcomes when compared with the open approach and is associated with a shorter hospitalization. Although laparoscopic paravaginal defect, cystocele, and rectocele repairs are technically feasible and may have a role as a concomitant procedure, a vaginal approach is more appropriate for an isolated operation.
腹腔镜检查为失禁和盆底手术提供了一种诱人的替代方法,否则这些手术需要开腹或经阴道操作会很困难。尽管一些数据表明,与开放手术或经阴道吊带术相比,腹腔镜下Burch手术的治愈率较低,但腹腔镜手术的安全性和相对疗效支持其继续应用。与开放手术相比,腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术似乎能产生相似的结果,且住院时间较短。虽然腹腔镜下阴道旁缺陷、膀胱膨出和直肠膨出修补术在技术上是可行的,并且可能作为一种伴随手术发挥作用,但经阴道手术更适合单独进行的手术。