Miyamae Koichi, Kitani Kosuke, Miyamoto Kenji, Hamada Shinsuke, Kawano Takashi, Maehara Akihito, Otsuka Yoshiaki, Otsuka Tomohiro, Hamada Yasuyuki
Department of Urology, Kumamoto Chuo Hospital.
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 2009 Jul;100(5):570-5. doi: 10.5980/jpnjurol.100.570.
We assessed the outcome after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for lymph node positive prostate cancer retrospectively. Furthermore, we compared the efficacy of immediate androgen deprivation adjuvant therapy in node positive patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy.
We investigated 62 patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and have been found to have lymph node positive prostate cancer at our facility between January 1992 and January 2008. We researched the clinical stages, the pathological stages and Gleason scores for pathological pN1 + prostate cancer, retrospectively. The serum PSA levels were followed up every 6 months, and we considered that biochemical progression was PSA >0.4 ng/ml. We classified the groups treated with or without immediate androgen deprivation adjuvant therapy, the biochemical progression free survival and cause specific survival were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the statistical significance was determined by the log rank test.
The rate of lymph node positive patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy was 7.1%. The rate of 8 or greater in Gleason score of all the lymph node positive patients was 68.3%. The 5-year prostate cancer specific survival and 5-year biochemical progression free survival rates were 90.3 and 67.4% of all the patients. The biochemical progression free survival rate of the group of patients who have received immediate androgen deprivation therapy after radical prostatectomy was significantly higher than that of the group of patients who have not received immediately androgen deprivation therapy.
It may be suggested that early androgen deprivation adjuvant therapy benefits patients with nodal metastases who have undergone radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy, compared with those who received deferred treatment, although in a retrospective nonrandomized study.
我们回顾性评估了淋巴结阳性前列腺癌患者行根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术后的结局。此外,我们比较了接受根治性前列腺切除术的淋巴结阳性患者立即进行雄激素剥夺辅助治疗的疗效。
我们调查了1992年1月至2008年1月期间在我院接受根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术且被发现为淋巴结阳性前列腺癌的62例患者。我们回顾性研究了病理pN1+前列腺癌的临床分期、病理分期和Gleason评分。每6个月随访血清PSA水平,我们认为生化进展为PSA>0.4 ng/ml。我们将接受或未接受立即雄激素剥夺辅助治疗的组进行分类,采用Kaplan-Meier方法分析无生化进展生存期和病因特异性生存期,并通过对数秩检验确定统计学意义。
接受根治性前列腺切除术的淋巴结阳性患者比例为7.1%。所有淋巴结阳性患者中Gleason评分8分或更高的比例为68.3%。所有患者的5年前列腺癌特异性生存率和5年无生化进展生存率分别为90.3%和67.4%。根治性前列腺切除术后接受立即雄激素剥夺治疗的患者组的无生化进展生存率显著高于未接受立即雄激素剥夺治疗的患者组。
尽管是一项回顾性非随机研究,但可以认为,与延迟治疗的患者相比,早期雄激素剥夺辅助治疗对接受根治性前列腺切除术和淋巴结清扫术的有淋巴结转移的患者有益。