Hobkirk J A, Wiskott H W A
UCL Eastman Dental Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:55-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01779.x.
The remit of this working group was to update the existing knowledge base in ceramics in implant dentistry. The reviews from working group 1 formed the basis for this update. Moreover, clinical applications as well as suggestions for further research have been formulated.
The papers in the working group critically reviewed the literature on the topic. Manuscripts were produced on: 1. The performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. 2. The viability of ceramic implants as alternatives to titanium implants. 3. The survival and complications of CAD-CAM reconstructions as compared with FDPs which have been fabricated using conventional techniques.
The results and conclusions of the review process are presented in the following papers, together with the group consensus statements, clinical implications and directions for future research: Sailer I., Philipp A., Zembic A., Pjetursson B. E., Hämmerle C. H. F., Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Andreiotelli M., Wenz H. J., Kohal R.-J. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Harder S., Kern M. Survival and complications of CAD-CAM vs. conventionally fabricated reconstructions: a systematic review.
该工作组的职责是更新种植义齿领域中陶瓷材料的现有知识库。工作组1的综述构成了此次更新的基础。此外,还制定了临床应用以及进一步研究的建议。
工作组的论文对该主题的文献进行了严格审查。撰写的手稿涉及:1. 支持固定种植修复体的陶瓷和金属种植基台的性能。2. 陶瓷种植体作为钛种植体替代品的可行性。3. 与采用传统技术制作的固定局部义齿相比,计算机辅助设计与制造(CAD-CAM)修复体的生存率和并发症情况。
综述过程的结果和结论在以下论文中呈现,同时还有小组共识声明、临床意义和未来研究方向:赛勒I.、菲利普A.、曾比克A.、佩图尔松B.E.、黑默勒C.H.F.、茨瓦伦M. 支持固定种植修复体的陶瓷和金属种植基台性能的系统评价。安德烈奥泰利M.、温茨H.J.、科哈尔R.-J. 陶瓷种植体能否成为钛种植体的可行替代品?系统文献综述。哈德S.、克恩M. CAD-CAM与传统制作的修复体的生存率和并发症:系统评价。