Suppr超能文献

尼古丁和可卡因引起的条件性位置偏爱之间的差异。

Differences between nicotine and cocaine-induced conditioned place preferences.

机构信息

Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, NY 10962, USA.

出版信息

Brain Res Bull. 2010 Jan 15;81(1):120-4. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.07.015.

Abstract

In previous studies, we found differences between nicotine and cocaine-induced changes in the levels of neurotransmitters in various brain areas, which suggested differences in their reward - preference mechanisms. The present study was based on the idea that drug preference is modulated by a number of different factors, among them several neurotransmitters and their receptors, and antagonists of specific receptors will influence preference. We also assumed that the factors (components of reward mechanisms) involved are different in the case of different drugs. We compared the inhibition of nicotine preference with cocaine preference. We assayed preference as conditioned place preference (CPP) and measured CPP inhibition by receptor subtype antagonists using mice. In general, induced CPP of cocaine was stronger than of nicotine as shown by more time spent in the nonpreferred area after conditioning with cocaine. We measured inhibition by four antagonists: mecamylamine, atropine, SCH23390, and phentolamine: antagonists respectively of nicotinic, and muscarinic acetylcholine, dopamine D1, and alpha noradrenergic receptors. The inhibition by the antagonists of cocaine CPP was lower in most instances than that of nicotine CPP. Atropine and SCH23390 inhibited nicotine and cocaine CPP approximately to the same degree, while the inhibition by mecamylamine and phentolamine of nicotine CPP was 100%; that of cocaine was 20% and 0, respectively. We conclude that several receptor systems and transmitters play a role in drug preference, some represent essential elements or circuits, some may be only required partially or their role can be partially substituted. The composition of such systems is different for different drugs - in the present study, some of the components influencing CPP are different for nicotine as opposed to cocaine.

摘要

在以前的研究中,我们发现尼古丁和可卡因引起的不同脑区神经递质水平变化之间存在差异,这表明它们的奖励偏好机制存在差异。本研究基于这样一种观点,即药物偏好受多种不同因素的调节,其中包括几种神经递质及其受体,特定受体的拮抗剂会影响偏好。我们还假设,不同药物涉及的因素(奖励机制的组成部分)不同。我们比较了尼古丁偏好和可卡因偏好的抑制作用。我们通过老鼠进行了条件位置偏好(CPP)的测定,并使用受体亚型拮抗剂来测量 CPP 的抑制作用。一般来说,可卡因诱导的 CPP 比尼古丁更强,因为在可卡因条件作用后,非偏好区域的时间更长。我们测量了四种拮抗剂的抑制作用:美加明、阿托品、SCH23390 和苯肾上腺素:分别为烟碱型和毒蕈碱型乙酰胆碱、多巴胺 D1 和α去甲肾上腺素受体的拮抗剂。在大多数情况下,与尼古丁 CPP 相比,可卡因 CPP 的拮抗剂抑制作用较低。阿托品和 SCH23390 对尼古丁和可卡因 CPP 的抑制作用大致相同,而美加明和苯肾上腺素对尼古丁 CPP 的抑制作用为 100%;对可卡因的抑制作用分别为 20%和 0。我们得出的结论是,几种受体系统和递质在药物偏好中起作用,一些代表基本元素或回路,一些可能只部分需要,或者它们的作用可以部分替代。对于不同的药物,这种系统的组成是不同的-在本研究中,影响 CPP 的一些成分对于尼古丁与可卡因来说是不同的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验