Suppr超能文献

新诊断的高级别恶性脑胶质瘤患者围手术期使用抗癫痫药物:单中心经验。

Use of peri-operative anti-epileptic drugs in patients with newly diagnosed high grade malignant glioma: a single center experience.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurooncol. 2010 Feb;96(3):403-8. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9977-2. Epub 2009 Aug 8.

Abstract

An American Academy of Neurology practice parameter recommends that long-term prophylactic anti-epileptic drugs (AED) should not be routine in patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors. However, prospective multi-center North American data shows that most newly diagnosed glioma patients receive prophylactic AED. We examined our own peri-operative AED practice patterns in newly-diagnosed patients with malignant glioma to determine if we deviate from published guidelines. A retrospective chart review was performed in adult patients with newly diagnosed malignant gliomas undergoing surgery in southern Alberta between January 2003 and December 2005. Demographic information, AED use, seizure incidence, adverse effects, tumor size, and tumor location were recorded. Of 164 eligible patients, 54 (33%) presented with seizures and all received AED. Prophylactic AED were given to 44 patients (27%). Peri-operative seizures (within 1 week) occurred in two patients without (3%) and no patients with seizure prophylaxis. Adverse AED reactions and adverse effects attributable to seizures were both rare. Prophylactic AED were continued >1 week post-op in 30 patients (18%). Patients receiving prophylactic AED were more likely to have had tumors involving the temporal lobe than those who did not (50 vs. 20%; P < 0.01). Patients receiving peri-operative AED prophylaxis were common, had a trend to reduced peri-operative seizures, and had few adverse effects. However, most of these patients were maintained on prophylactic AED continued beyond the first peri-operative week, contradicting published guidelines. Increased awareness of practice guidelines may help modify AED prescription patterns in malignant glioma patients.

摘要

美国神经病学学会的一项实践参数建议,对于新诊断的脑瘤患者,不应常规长期预防性使用抗癫痫药物(AED)。然而,前瞻性多中心北美数据显示,大多数新诊断的胶质瘤患者接受预防性 AED。我们检查了我们自己在新诊断的恶性胶质瘤患者中的围手术期 AED 实践模式,以确定我们是否偏离了已发表的指南。对 2003 年 1 月至 2005 年 12 月在艾伯塔省南部接受手术的新诊断的恶性胶质瘤成年患者进行了回顾性图表审查。记录了人口统计学信息、AED 使用、癫痫发作发生率、不良反应、肿瘤大小和肿瘤位置。在 164 名符合条件的患者中,54 名(33%)出现癫痫发作,所有患者均接受 AED 治疗。预防性 AED 用于 44 例患者(27%)。在 2 名无(3%)和无癫痫预防的患者中,围手术期发作(术后 1 周内)发生在 2 名患者中。罕见发生 AED 不良反应和与癫痫发作相关的不良反应。在 30 名患者(18%)中,术后超过 1 周继续使用预防性 AED。接受预防性 AED 的患者更有可能有颞叶受累的肿瘤,而不是没有颞叶受累的患者(50%比 20%;P<0.01)。接受围手术期 AED 预防的患者很常见,有减少围手术期癫痫发作的趋势,且不良反应很少。然而,这些患者中的大多数在术后第一周继续预防性使用 AED,这与已发表的指南相矛盾。提高对实践指南的认识可能有助于改变恶性胶质瘤患者的 AED 处方模式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验