Mashour George A, Esaki Roy K, Vandervest John C, Shanks Amy, Kheterpal Sachin
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, 48109-5048, USA.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2009 Oct;23(5):273-7. doi: 10.1007/s10877-009-9193-9. Epub 2009 Aug 8.
A recent clinical trial compared a minimum alveolar concentration (MAC)-based protocol to an electroencephalography (EEG)-based protocol for the prevention of intraoperative awareness. One limitation of this study design is that MAC-based protocols are not sensitive to the use of intravenous agents, while EEG-based protocols are. Our objective was to develop a MAC alert that incorporates intravenous agents.
We developed an electronic algorithm and alerting system that calculates a total age-adjusted MAC value based on inhalational agents, but also incorporates intravenous agents. We retrospectively applied the algorithm to adult general anesthesia cases over a 1 year period to assess the frequency of alert triggers, using thresholds of <0.8, <0.7, <0.6, <0.5 and <0.4 age-adjusted MAC. We also electronically analyzed 12 cases of intraoperative awareness that occurred over a 4-year period for the frequency of alert triggers using the same thresholds. Finally, we calculated positive and negative likelihood ratios based on these analyses.
Over a 1-year period we identified 15,091 cases without self-reported awareness that were valid for analysis. At all age-adjusted MAC thresholds, the incidence of triggered alerts was higher in the awareness cases. The threshold of<0.8 age-adjusted MAC was associated with the highest negative likelihood ratio; the<0.5 age-adjusted MAC was associated with the highest positive likelihood ratio.
Our novel electronic alerting system incorporates both age-adjusted MAC and intravenous anesthesia, and triggers with a higher frequency in cases of awareness. These data suggest the potential for our system to alert clinicians to insufficient anesthesia.
最近一项临床试验比较了基于最低肺泡浓度(MAC)的方案和基于脑电图(EEG)的方案预防术中知晓的效果。该研究设计的一个局限性在于基于MAC的方案对静脉用药不敏感,而基于EEG的方案则敏感。我们的目标是开发一种纳入静脉用药的MAC警报。
我们开发了一种电子算法和警报系统,该系统基于吸入麻醉药计算年龄校正后的总MAC值,同时也纳入静脉用药。我们回顾性地将该算法应用于1年期间的成人全身麻醉病例,使用<0.8、<0.7、<0.6、<0.5和<0.4年龄校正MAC的阈值评估警报触发频率。我们还对4年期间发生的12例术中知晓病例进行电子分析,使用相同阈值评估警报触发频率。最后,我们基于这些分析计算阳性和阴性似然比。
在1年期间,我们确定了15091例无自我报告知晓且可用于分析的病例。在所有年龄校正MAC阈值下,知晓病例中触发警报的发生率更高。<0.8年龄校正MAC的阈值与最高的阴性似然比相关;<0.5年龄校正MAC的阈值与最高的阳性似然比相关。
我们新颖的电子警报系统同时纳入了年龄校正MAC和静脉麻醉,并在知晓病例中触发频率更高。这些数据表明我们的系统有可能提醒临床医生麻醉不足。