HealthMetrics Outcomes Research, 120 Anchorage Circle, Groton, CT 06340, USA.
Adv Ther. 2009 Aug;26(8):762-75. doi: 10.1007/s12325-009-0056-z. Epub 2009 Aug 8.
Examine outcomes and costs of patients with persistent asthma who initiated treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate hydrofluoroalkane (BDP-HFA) or fluticasone propionate (FP).
MedStat's Commercial Claims and Encounters database (July 1, 2002-June 30, 2007) was utilized. Patients (n=13,968) were included if they initiated treatment with BDP-HFA or FP (first use=index date). Patients also met these criteria: (a) no receipt of other study medication in the 1-year post-period; (b) persistent asthma in the 1-year pre-period; (c) age 5-64 years; (d) no diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; and (e) continuous insurance coverage from 1 year pre-period to 1 year post-period. Multivariate regressions examined the probability of an ER visit or hospitalization, probability of reaching alternative adherence thresholds, and costs.
Receipt of BDP-HFA, compared with FP, was associated with a 17% reduction in the odds of an ER visit (OR=0.834, 95% CI 0.751 to 0.925), a 30% reduction in the odds of an asthma-related ER visit (OR=0.697, 95% CI 0.571 to 0.852), and an increase in the odds of obtaining a medication possession ratio (MPR) of at least 50% (OR=1.324; 95% CI 1.164 to 1.506) or 75% (OR=1.311; 95% CI 1.072 to 1.604). Total medical costs ($5063 vs. $5377, P=0.0042), prescription drug costs ($2336 vs. $2581, P<0.0001), and ER costs ($185 vs. $249, P<0.0001) were significantly lower among the BDP-HFA cohort. Asthma-related outpatient ($191 vs. $224, P<0.0001) and ER costs ($28 vs. $45, P<0.001) were significantly lower in the BDP-HFA group, while asthma-related inpatient ($101 vs. $59, P<0.0001) and drug costs ($451 vs. $540, P<0.0001) were significantly lower in the FP cohort.
Results indicate that receipt of BDP-HFA, compared with receipt of FP, is associated with a decreased probability of ER visits or asthma-related ER visits and higher odds of reaching a medical possession ratio threshold of 50% or 75%. Receipt of BDP-HFA was also associated with lower total drug costs and lower total medical costs.
研究接受丙酸倍氯米松氢氟烷(BDP-HFA)或丙酸氟替卡松(FP)治疗的持续性哮喘患者的结局和成本。
利用 MedStat 的商业索赔和遭遇数据库(2002 年 7 月 1 日至 2007 年 6 月 30 日)。如果患者(n=13968)在接受 BDP-HFA 或 FP 治疗(首次使用=索引日期)后开始治疗,则符合入选标准。患者还符合以下标准:(a)在 1 年后期内未接受其他研究药物治疗;(b)在 1 年前期内患有持续性哮喘;(c)年龄 5-64 岁;(d)无慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断;(e)1 年前期至 1 年后期连续保险覆盖。多元回归分析考察了急诊就诊或住院的概率、达到替代依从性阈值的概率以及成本。
与 FP 相比,使用 BDP-HFA 与急诊就诊(OR=0.834,95%CI 0.751 至 0.925)、哮喘相关急诊就诊(OR=0.697,95%CI 0.571 至 0.852)的可能性降低 17%,以及获得药物利用率(MPR)至少 50%(OR=1.324;95%CI 1.164 至 1.506)或 75%(OR=1.311;95%CI 1.072 至 1.604)的可能性增加。BDP-HFA 队列的总医疗费用($5063 与 $5377,P=0.0042)、处方药费用($2336 与 $2581,P<0.0001)和急诊费用($185 与 $249,P<0.0001)显著较低。BDP-HFA 组哮喘相关门诊($191 与 $224,P<0.0001)和急诊费用($28 与 $45,P<0.001)显著较低,而哮喘相关住院($101 与 $59,P<0.0001)和药物费用($451 与 $540,P<0.0001)显著较低。
结果表明,与接受 FP 相比,接受 BDP-HFA 治疗与急诊就诊或哮喘相关急诊就诊的可能性降低以及达到 MPR 50%或 75%阈值的可能性增加相关。接受 BDP-HFA 治疗还与较低的总药物成本和总医疗成本相关。