Ashworth D J, Ernst F F, Xuan R, Yates S R
USDA-ARS, U.S. Salinity Laboratory, 450 W. Big Springs Road, Riverside, California 92507, USA.
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Jul 1;43(13):5073-8. doi: 10.1021/es900049g.
With the increased use of the agricultural fumigants 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and chloropicrin (CP), it is important that strategies to reduce emissions of these fumigant from soil to the air are assessed to protect air quality. Using an established soil column approach, the following emission reduction strategies were compared to a control: (1) spray application of ammonium thiosulfate to the soil surface; (2) deep injection at 46 cm depth; (3) high density polyethylene sealed over the soil surface; (4) virtually impermeable film sealed over the soil surface; and (5) irrigation with ammonium thiosulfate solution. Relative to the control, 1,3-D emissions were reduced by 26.1, 1.0, 0.01, 94.2, and 42.5%, for treatments 1 through 5, respectively. For CP the reductions were 41.6, 23.3, 94.6, 99.9, and 87.5% for treatments 1 through 5, respectively. Virtually impermeable film gave the greatest reductions for both fumigants, while HDPE was very effective only for CP. Despite offering less significant emission reductions, the lower cost alternatives to tarping, particularly irrigation with ATS solution, may offer substantial benefitwhere tarping is not economically viable.
随着农业熏蒸剂1,3 - 二氯丙烯(1,3 - D)和氯化苦(CP)使用量的增加,评估减少这些熏蒸剂从土壤向空气中排放的策略对于保护空气质量至关重要。采用既定的土柱方法,将以下减排策略与对照进行了比较:(1)向土壤表面喷洒硫代硫酸铵;(2)在46厘米深度进行深层注射;(3)在土壤表面覆盖高密度聚乙烯;(4)在土壤表面覆盖几乎不可渗透的薄膜;(5)用硫代硫酸铵溶液灌溉。相对于对照,处理1至5的1,3 - D排放量分别减少了26.1%、1.0%、0.01%、94.2%和42.5%。对于CP,处理1至5的减排量分别为41.6%、23.3%、94.6%、99.9%和87.5%。几乎不可渗透的薄膜对两种熏蒸剂的减排效果最佳,而高密度聚乙烯仅对CP非常有效。尽管减排效果不太显著,但覆盖物的低成本替代方案,特别是用硫代硫酸铵溶液灌溉,在覆盖物在经济上不可行的情况下可能会带来巨大益处。