National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop F-62, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, USA.
Addiction. 2009 Sep;104(9):1541-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02650.x.
AIMS: To describe all people dying from unintentional overdoses of methadone or other opioid analgesics (OOA) in West Virginia in 2006. DESIGN: We analyzed medical examiner data supplemented by data from the state prescription drug monitoring program. We compared people whose deaths involved methadone with those whose deaths involved OOA. FINDINGS: The methadone group included 87 decedents, and the OOA group included 163 decedents. Most were male. Decedents in the methadone group were significantly younger than those in the OOA group: more than a quarter were 18-24 years of age. For both groups, approximately 50% had a history of pain, and 80% had a history of substance abuse. There was no intergroup difference in the prevalence of benzodiazepines at post-mortem. Methadone was significantly less likely to have ever been prescribed than OOA. Among those with prescriptions, the proportion prescribed within 30 days of death was significantly greater for methadone than for hydrocodone, but not for oxycodone. Ten (11.5%) of the methadone decedents were enrolled in an opiate treatment program (OTP) at the time of death. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of a substance abuse history and lack of prescriptions suggest that most of the deaths in both groups are related to substance abuse. There was no indication of a harmful effect from methadone's metabolic interaction with benzodiazepines, but provider or patient unfamiliarity with methadone may have been a risk factor. Prescribing methadone, especially to young males, requires extra care. Providers, OTPs and coroners/medical examiners should use state prescription drug monitoring programs to monitor the use of controlled substances by their patients.
目的:描述 2006 年西弗吉尼亚州所有死于非故意过量服用美沙酮或其他类阿片镇痛药(OOA)的人。
设计:我们分析了法医数据,并辅以州处方药物监测计划的数据。我们比较了涉及美沙酮和 OOA 的死亡者。
发现:美沙酮组包括 87 名死者,OOA 组包括 163 名死者。大多数是男性。美沙酮组的死者明显比 OOA 组年轻:超过四分之一的人年龄在 18-24 岁之间。对于两组,大约 50%的人有疼痛史,80%的人有药物滥用史。死后两组间苯二氮䓬类药物的患病率没有差异。美沙酮的处方明显少于 OOA。在有处方的人群中,美沙酮在死亡前 30 天内开处方的比例明显高于氢可酮,但不如羟考酮。10 名(11.5%)美沙酮死者在死亡时参加了阿片类药物治疗计划(OTP)。
结论:药物滥用史和缺乏处方的高患病率表明,两组的大多数死亡都与药物滥用有关。没有迹象表明美沙酮与苯二氮䓬类药物的代谢相互作用有有害影响,但提供者或患者对美沙酮不熟悉可能是一个风险因素。开美沙酮处方,尤其是给年轻男性,需要格外小心。提供者、OTP 和验尸官/法医应使用州处方药物监测计划来监测其患者对受控物质的使用情况。
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2011-6
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009-10-30
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015-10-16
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2008
Hand (N Y). 2024-9
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020-9-1
Public Health Rep. 2019-10-2
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2019-7-19
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019-2-3