Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Medical Biology, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010 Jan;106(1):2-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2009.00456.x. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
The aim of this conceptual framework paper is to contribute to the further development of the modelling of effects of drugs or toxic agents by an approach which is based on the underlying physiology and pathology of the biological processes. In general, modelling of data has the purpose (1) to describe experimental data, (2a) to reduce the amount of data resulting from an experiment, e.g. a clinical trial and (2b) to obtain the most relevant parameters, (3) to test hypotheses and (4) to make predictions within the boundaries of experimental conditions, e.g. range of doses tested (interpolation) and out of the boundaries of the experimental conditions, e.g. to extrapolate from animal data to the situation in man. Describing the drug/xenobiotic-target interaction and the chain of biological events following the interaction is the first step to build a biologically based model. This is an approach to represent the underlying biological mechanisms in qualitative and also quantitative terms, thus being inherently connected in many aspects to systems biology. As the systems biology models may contain variables in the order of hundreds connected with differential equations, it is obvious that it is in most cases not possible to assign values to the variables resulting from experimental data. Reduction techniques may be used to create a manageable model which, however, captures the biologically meaningful events in qualitative and quantitative terms. Until now, some success has been obtained by applying empirical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models which describe direct and indirect relationships between the xenobiotic molecule and the effect, including tolerance. Some of the models may have physiological components built in the structure of the model and use parameter estimates from published data. In recent years, some progress toward semi-mechanistic models has been made, examples being chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression and glucose-endogenous insulin-antidiabetic drug interactions. We see a way forward by employing approaches to bridge the gap between systems biology and physiologically based kinetic and dynamic models. To be useful for decision making, the 'bridging' model should have a well founded mechanistic basis, but being reduced to the extent that its parameters can be deduced from experimental data, however capturing the biological/clinical essential details so that meaningful predictions and extrapolations can be made.
本文旨在通过一种基于生物学过程的基础生理学和病理学的方法,为药物或毒性物质作用的建模提供进一步的发展。一般来说,数据建模的目的是:(1)描述实验数据;(2a)减少实验结果的数据量,例如临床试验;(2b)获得最相关的参数;(3)检验假设;(4)在实验条件范围内进行预测,例如测试剂量范围(内插)和实验条件范围之外,例如从动物数据外推到人类情况。描述药物/外源化学物-靶标相互作用以及相互作用后生物事件链是构建基于生物学的模型的第一步。这是一种以定性和定量方式表示潜在生物学机制的方法,因此在许多方面与系统生物学密切相关。由于系统生物学模型可能包含与微分方程相关的数百个变量,因此显然,在大多数情况下,不可能根据实验数据为变量赋值。减少技术可用于创建一个可管理的模型,但它可以以定性和定量方式捕捉具有生物学意义的事件。到目前为止,应用描述外源化学物分子与效应(包括耐受性)之间直接和间接关系的经验药代动力学/药效动力学模型已经取得了一些成功。一些模型可能在结构中包含生理成分,并使用来自已发表数据的参数估计。近年来,半机械模型取得了一些进展,例如化疗诱导的骨髓抑制和葡萄糖内源性胰岛素抗糖尿病药物相互作用。我们认为,通过采用方法来弥合系统生物学和基于生理学的动力学和动态模型之间的差距,是一种前进的方式。为了用于决策,“桥接”模型应该具有良好的基于机制的基础,但要简化到可以从实验数据中推断出其参数的程度,同时捕捉生物学/临床的重要细节,以便进行有意义的预测和外推。