Berge A C B, Moore D A, Besser T E, Sischo W M
Berge Veterinary Consulting, Helsingborg, Sweden.
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4707-14. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2199.
Prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial use in food animals is questioned because of the potential for development of resistant bacteria and future inability to use some antimicrobials for human or animal disease. The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of raising preweaned dairy calves without antimicrobials in the milk and minimizing therapeutic antimicrobial treatment on morbidity, mortality, weight gain, and treatment costs. Newborn calves (n = 358) were allocated to 1 of 4 groups, housed outdoors in individual hutches, and monitored for 28 d. Calves in the conventional therapy (CT) group were treated as per dairy protocol with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, spectinomycin, penicillin, and bismuth-pectin for diarrhea. The targeted therapy (TT) group included bismuth-pectin for diarrhea and antimicrobial treatment only in cases of fever or depressed attitude. Within CT and TT groups, calves were equally assigned to receive neomycin and tetracycline in their milk for the first 2 wk of life (AB-milk) or no antimicrobials (NoAB-milk). Daily health evaluations included fecal consistency, respiratory disease, attitude, and hydration status as well as milk and grain consumption. A negative binomial model evaluated the total number of days with diarrhea days in each group. General linear models were used to assess average daily weight gain and grain consumption. Conventionally treated calves had 70% more days with diarrhea than TT calves, and AB-milk calves had 31% more days with diarrhea compared with NoAB-milk calves. The TT calves tended to have a higher average daily gain by 28 d and consumed more grain compared with CT calves. If antimicrobials were used only for diarrhea cases with fever, inappetence, or depression and no in-milk antimicrobials were used, a $10 per calf savings could be realized. Targeting antimicrobial therapy of calf diarrhea cases is prudent not only to save the drugs for future use but also to prevent the potential for antibiotic-associated diarrhea and reduce calf-rearing costs.
由于存在产生耐药菌的可能性以及未来无法将某些抗菌药物用于人类或动物疾病治疗,食品动物预防性和治疗性使用抗菌药物受到质疑。本研究的目的是确定在牛奶中不使用抗菌药物饲养断奶前奶牛犊,并尽量减少治疗性抗菌药物治疗对发病率、死亡率、体重增加和治疗成本的影响。将新生犊牛(n = 358)分配到4组中的1组,饲养在户外的单独畜栏中,并监测28天。常规治疗(CT)组的犊牛按照奶牛治疗方案,使用磺胺甲恶唑/甲氧苄啶、壮观霉素、青霉素和铋果胶治疗腹泻。靶向治疗(TT)组包括使用铋果胶治疗腹泻,仅在发热或精神萎靡的情况下进行抗菌治疗。在CT组和TT组中,犊牛在出生后的前2周内被平均分配,分别在牛奶中添加新霉素和四环素(含抗菌药物牛奶组)或不添加抗菌药物(无抗菌药物牛奶组)。每日健康评估包括粪便稠度、呼吸道疾病、精神状态和水合状态以及牛奶和谷物摄入量。采用负二项式模型评估每组腹泻天数的总和。使用一般线性模型评估平均日增重和谷物摄入量。常规治疗的犊牛腹泻天数比TT组犊牛多70%,含抗菌药物牛奶组犊牛的腹泻天数比无抗菌药物牛奶组犊牛多31%。与CT组犊牛相比,TT组犊牛到28天时平均日增重更高,且消耗的谷物更多。如果仅将抗菌药物用于伴有发热、食欲不振或精神萎靡的腹泻病例,且不使用牛奶中添加抗菌药物的方法,每头犊牛可节省10美元。针对犊牛腹泻病例进行靶向抗菌治疗是明智的,这不仅可以节省药物以供未来使用,还可以预防抗生素相关性腹泻的可能性,并降低犊牛饲养成本。