Department of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2009 Jun;5(3):465-8. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s5927. Epub 2009 Jul 12.
Endoscopic transmural drainage by using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance is not always safe because of the risk of bleeding and perforation. Additionally, the effective area of the EUS-guided procedure using a large diameter needle is relatively narrow. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of EUS-guided drainage using fine needle and stiff fine guidewire without electrocautery. From November 2006 to July 2008, EUS-guided transmural drainage was performed in six consecutive patients for peripancreatic fluid collections. Puncture via EUS was performed by using a 22-gauge needle. A 0.018-inch guidewire was advanced through the needle and into the peripancreatic fluid collections. After the puncture site was dilated, a 6 Fr tube was immersed in the peripancreatic fluid collections. Five of six patients were successfully drained and treated effectively. One patient was unable to be drained because the dilator could not penetrate the gastric wall. The 22-gauge fine needle and stiff fine guidewire technique can be an alternative to the standard method for difficult puncture sites and risky cases.
EUS 引导下的内镜经壁引流并不总是安全的,因为有出血和穿孔的风险。此外,使用大直径针的 EUS 引导程序的有效区域相对较窄。我们评估了不使用电烙术的细针和硬导丝进行 EUS 引导引流的有效性和安全性。从 2006 年 11 月至 2008 年 7 月,对 6 例胰周积液患者连续进行了 EUS 引导下的经壁引流。通过 EUS 进行穿刺使用 22 号针。将 0.018 英寸导丝通过针推进至胰周积液中。穿刺部位扩张后,将 6Fr 管浸入胰周积液中。6 例患者中有 5 例成功引流并得到有效治疗。1 例患者因扩张器无法穿透胃壁而无法引流。22 号细针和硬导丝技术可作为标准方法的替代方法,用于困难穿刺部位和高危病例。