Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Stat Med. 2009 Nov 30;28(27):3347-62. doi: 10.1002/sim.3711.
Bayesian decision theoretic approaches (BDTAs) have been widely studied in the literature as tools for designing and conducting phase II clinical trials. However, full Bayesian approaches that consider multiple endpoints are lacking. Since the monitoring of toxicity is a major goal of phase II trials, we propose an adaptive group sequential design using a BDTA, which characterizes efficacy and toxicity as correlated bivariate binary endpoints. We allow trade-off between the two endpoints. Interim evaluations are conducted group sequentially, but the number of interim looks and the size of each group are chosen adaptively based on current observations.We utilize a loss function consisting of two components: the loss associated with accruing, treating, and monitoring patients, and the loss associated with making incorrect decisions. The performance of our Bayesian modeling, and the operating characteristics of decision rules under a wide range of loss function parameters are evaluated using seven scenarios in a simulation study.Our method is illustrated in the context of a single-arm phase II trial of bevacizumab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
贝叶斯决策理论方法(BDTAs)在文献中被广泛研究,作为设计和进行 II 期临床试验的工具。然而,考虑多个终点的全贝叶斯方法却缺乏。由于毒性监测是 II 期试验的主要目标,我们提出了一种使用 BDTAs 的自适应分组序贯设计,将疗效和毒性作为相关的二元二项终点进行特征描述。我们允许在这两个终点之间进行权衡。中期评估是分组序贯进行的,但根据当前观察结果,中期观察的次数和每组的大小都是自适应选择的。我们利用一个由两个组成部分组成的损失函数:与招募、治疗和监测患者相关的损失,以及与做出错误决策相关的损失。我们通过在仿真研究中的七个场景来评估我们的贝叶斯建模的性能,以及在广泛的损失函数参数下决策规则的操作特征。我们的方法在转移性胰腺腺癌患者中贝伐单抗、吉西他滨和奥沙利铂的单臂 II 期试验中进行了说明。