Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, TX 78712-1088, USA.
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Aug;34(4):310-23. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9195-7. Epub 2009 Aug 29.
Social psychologist Erving Goffman, in his classic work The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, provides a framework that explains why jurors may turn their attention at the courthouse to information not formally presented from the witness stand. We dub this "offstage observation," a type of juror behavior that has not been systematically examined empirically. Analyzing a unique data source of 50 actual jury deliberations in civil trials, we find that jurors do look to the offstage in evaluating the claims of the parties. However, in contrast to predictions, these observations played a surprisingly minor role in the jury deliberation process.
社会心理学家欧文·戈夫曼(Erving Goffman)在其经典著作《日常生活中的自我呈现》(The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life)中提供了一个框架,解释了为什么陪审员在法庭上可能会将注意力转向证人席上没有正式提出的信息。我们将其称为“幕后观察”,这是一种尚未系统地通过实证检验的陪审员行为。通过分析民事审判中 50 个实际陪审团审议的独特数据源,我们发现陪审员在评估双方的主张时确实会关注幕后情况。然而,与预测相反,这些观察在陪审团审议过程中所起的作用令人惊讶地较小。