• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

唐氏综合征患儿父母中21号染色体的重组率。

Rate of recombination of chromosomes 21 in parents of children with Down syndrome.

作者信息

Hamers A J, Meyer H, Jongbloed R J, van der Hulst R R, Geraedts J P

机构信息

Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Genet. 1990 Jun;37(6):463-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1990.tb03531.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0004.1990.tb03531.x
PMID:1974486
Abstract

To test the hypothesis of reduced chiasma frequency causing nondisjunction during meiosis, we examined 34 Down syndrome patients and their parents. Chromosomal polymorphisms and RFLP markers were used to trace the parental origin as well as the frequency of recombination of chromosomes 21. In all but one case, the parental origin and the meiotic stage of nondisjunction could be established by either technique. In 11 cases recombination could be deduced to have taken place during meiosis in the parent who contributed the extra chromosome 21. Because of the underestimation which is inherent in the methods used, these results do not seem to support the chiasma theory.

摘要

为了验证减数分裂过程中交叉频率降低导致不分离这一假说,我们研究了34名唐氏综合征患者及其父母。利用染色体多态性和限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)标记来追踪21号染色体的亲本来源以及重组频率。除了1例之外,通过这两种技术均可确定不分离的亲本来源和减数分裂阶段。在11例中,可以推断出在贡献额外21号染色体的亲本减数分裂过程中发生了重组。由于所用方法存在固有的低估情况,这些结果似乎并不支持交叉理论。

相似文献

1
Rate of recombination of chromosomes 21 in parents of children with Down syndrome.唐氏综合征患儿父母中21号染色体的重组率。
Clin Genet. 1990 Jun;37(6):463-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1990.tb03531.x.
2
Nondisjunction of chromosome 21.21号染色体不分离。
Am J Med Genet Suppl. 1990;7:175-81. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320370735.
3
Parental origin, nondisjunction, and recombination of the extra chromosome 21 in Down syndrome: a study in a sample of the Colombian population.唐氏综合征中21号额外染色体的亲本来源、不分离及重组:对哥伦比亚人群样本的一项研究
Biomedica. 2007 Mar;27(1):141-8. Epub 2007 May 31.
4
Crossing over and chromosome 21 nondisjunction: a study of 60 families.交叉互换与21号染色体不分离:对60个家庭的研究
Am J Med Genet Suppl. 1990;7:141-7. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320370729.
5
Distribution of meiotic recombination along nondisjunction chromosomes 21 in Down syndrome determined using cytogenetics and RFLP haplotyping.利用细胞遗传学和限制性片段长度多态性单倍型分析确定唐氏综合征中21号染色体不分离时减数分裂重组的分布情况。
Hum Genet. 1989 Oct;83(3):280-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00285173.
6
The meiotic stage of nondisjunction in trisomy 21: determination by using DNA polymorphisms.21三体综合征中不分离的减数分裂阶段:通过使用DNA多态性进行确定
Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Mar;50(3):544-50.
7
Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome): studying nondisjunction and meiotic recombination by using cytogenetic and molecular polymorphisms that span chromosome 21.21三体综合征(唐氏综合征):利用跨越21号染色体的细胞遗传学和分子多态性研究不分离和减数分裂重组。
Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Feb;42(2):227-36.
8
Risk of Down syndrome birth: Consanguineous marriage is associated with maternal meiosis-II nondisjunction at younger age and without any detectable recombination error.唐氏综合征出生风险:近亲结婚与母亲减数分裂 II 中非姊妹染色单体交换发生在较年轻时且无任何可检测到的重组错误相关。
Am J Med Genet A. 2018 Nov;176(11):2342-2349. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.40511. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
9
Nondisjunction in trisomy 21: origin and mechanisms.21三体综合征中的不分离:起源与机制
Cytogenet Cell Genet. 2000;91(1-4):199-203. doi: 10.1159/000056844.
10
Parental origin and meiotic stage of non-disjunction in 139 cases of trisomy 21.139例21三体综合征病例中不分离的亲本来源及减数分裂阶段
Ann Genet. 1999;42(1):11-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Trisomy 21: association between reduced recombination and nondisjunction.21三体综合征:重组减少与染色体不分离之间的关联。
Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Sep;49(3):608-20.
2
Comparative study of microsatellite and cytogenetic markers for detecting the origin of the nondisjoined chromosome 21 in Down syndrome.用于检测唐氏综合征中未分离21号染色体起源的微卫星和细胞遗传学标记的比较研究
Am J Hum Genet. 1992 Sep;51(3):516-25.