The Department of Orthopedic Surgery of Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Korea.
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6):932-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.031. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
Most reports on the use of modular femoral stems during revision surgery have involved short follow-up periods. The authors evaluated the clinical and radiographic performance of 59 patients fitted with a distal fix modular stem. The average follow-up period was 8.2 years. Average Harris hip score was improved from 47 to 87.6. Of 19 patients with trochanteric osteotomy, 4 had a displaced greater trochanter. Re-revision was performed in 5 patients, and 3 of these were for subsidence (of these 3, subsidence was associated with dissociation of the coupling part in 1 and with osteotomy nonunion in other 2 [proximal component only]). Modular distally fixed femoral stems were found to offer intraoperative flexibility, but to suffer from subsidence and intraoperative greater trochanter and metaphyseal femoral fractures.
大多数关于在翻修手术中使用模块化股骨柄的报告都涉及随访时间较短的情况。作者评估了 59 例使用远端固定模块化柄的患者的临床和影像学表现。平均随访时间为 8.2 年。平均 Harris 髋关节评分从 47 分提高到 87.6 分。19 例行转子间截骨术的患者中,有 4 例出现大转子移位。5 例患者进行了再次翻修,其中 3 例出现下沉(这 3 例中,1 例与连接部分分离有关,另外 2 例与骨不连有关[仅近端组件])。发现模块化远端固定股骨柄具有术中灵活性,但存在下沉以及术中发生大转子和干骺端股骨骨折的风险。