Department of Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA.
Blood. 2010 Jan 28;115(4):775-7; quiz 918. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-08-234351. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
Positive interim positron emission tomography (PET) scans are thought to be associated with inferior outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In the E3404 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma study, PET scans at baseline and after 3 cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone were centrally reviewed by a single reader. To determine the reproducibility of interim PET interpretation, an expert panel of 3 external nuclear medicine physicians visually scored baseline and interim PET scans independently and were blinded to clinical information. The binary Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study criteria were based on modifications of the Harmonization Criteria; the London criteria were also applied. Of 38 interim scans, agreement was complete in 68% and 71% by ECOG and London criteria, respectively. The range of PET(+) interim scans was 16% to 34% (P = not significant) by reviewer. Moderate consistency of reviews was observed: kappa statistic = 0.445 using ECOG criteria, and kappa statistic = 0.502 using London criteria. These data, showing only moderate reproducibility among nuclear medicine experts, indicate the need to standardize PET interpretation in research and practice. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00274924 [corrected].
正电子发射断层扫描(PET)的阳性中期扫描结果被认为与弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的预后不良有关。在 E3404 弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤研究中,基线和 3 个周期利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松治疗后的 PET 扫描由一位独立的中心读者进行了集中审查。为了确定中期 PET 解读的可重复性,一个由 3 名外部核医学医生组成的专家小组独立地对基线和中期 PET 扫描进行了视觉评分,并且对临床信息不知情。基于调和标准的修改,采用了东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)的二进制研究标准;也应用了伦敦标准。在 38 个中期扫描中,ECOG 和伦敦标准的完全一致性分别为 68%和 71%。由评审员确定的 PET(+)中期扫描范围为 16%至 34%(无统计学意义)。观察到审查具有中度一致性:使用 ECOG 标准的kappa 统计量为 0.445,使用伦敦标准的 kappa 统计量为 0.502。这些数据表明,核医学专家之间只有中度的可重复性,这表明需要在研究和实践中标准化 PET 解读。该试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册为#NCT00274924[更正]。