Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, 333 Waller Ave., Suite 200, Lexington, KY 40504, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2010 Nov;14(6):950-7. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0523-9.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded seven states, including Kentucky, to clarify statewide death certification practices in sudden, unexpected infant death and compare state performances with national expectations. Accurate assignment of the cause and manner of death in cases of sudden, unexpected infant death is critical for accurate vital statistics data to direct limited resources to appropriate targets, and to implement optimal and safe risk reduction strategies. The primary objectives are to (1) Compare SUID death certifications recommended by the KY medical examiners with the stated cause of death text field on the hard copy death electronic death certificates and (2) Compare KY and national SUID rates. Causes of death for SUID cases recommended by the medical examiners and those appearing on the hard copy and electronic death certificates in KY were collected retrospectively for 2004 and 2005. Medical examiner recommendations were based upon a classification scheme devised by them in 2003. Coroners hard copy death certificates and the cause of death rates in KY were compared to those occurring nationally. Eleven percent of infants dying suddenly and unexpectedly did not undergo autopsy during the study interval. The KY 2003 classification scheme for SIDS is at variance with the NICHD and San Diego SIDS definitions. Significant differences in causes of death recommended by medical examiners and those appearing on the hard copy and electronic death certificates were identified. SIDS rates increased in KY in contrast to decreasing rates nationally. Nationwide adoption of a widely used SIDS definition, such as that proposed in San Diego in 2004 as well as legislation by states to ensure autopsy in all cases of sudden unexpected infant death are recommended. Medical examiners' recommendations for cause of death should appear on death certificates. Multidisciplinary pediatric death review teams prospectively evaluating cases before death certification is recommended. Research into other jurisdictions death certification process is encouraged.
疾病控制与预防中心资助了包括肯塔基州在内的七个州,以澄清全州范围内突然发生的婴儿意外死亡的死亡证明做法,并将各州的表现与国家预期进行比较。在突然发生的婴儿意外死亡的情况下,准确确定死因和死亡方式对于准确的生命统计数据至关重要,以便将有限的资源引导至适当的目标,并实施最佳和安全的风险降低策略。主要目标是:(1) 将肯塔基州法医推荐的 SUID 死亡证明与硬拷贝电子死亡证明上的死因文本字段进行比较,(2) 将肯塔基州和全国的 SUID 率进行比较。2004 年和 2005 年,肯塔基州对法医推荐的 SUID 病例死因和硬拷贝及电子死亡证明上的死因进行了回顾性收集。法医的建议是基于他们在 2003 年制定的分类方案。与全国相比,法医的硬拷贝死亡证明和肯塔基州的死因发生率。在研究期间,11%的突然意外死亡的婴儿没有进行尸检。肯塔基州 2003 年的 SIDS 分类方案与 NICHD 和圣地亚哥 SIDS 定义不一致。法医推荐的死因与硬拷贝和电子死亡证明上的死因之间存在显著差异。与全国范围内的死亡率下降相比,肯塔基州的 SIDS 率有所上升。建议全国范围内采用广泛使用的 SIDS 定义,例如 2004 年圣地亚哥提出的定义,以及各州立法确保所有突然意外婴儿死亡的情况下进行尸检。法医对死因的建议应出现在死亡证明上。建议在死亡证明之前,由多学科儿科死亡审查小组前瞻性评估病例。鼓励对其他司法管辖区的死亡证明程序进行研究。