INRA, UMR914 Nutrition Physiology and Ingestive Behavior, F-75005 Paris, France.
Metabolism. 2010 Feb;59(2):231-40. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2009.07.017. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
The fatty acid composition of high-fat diets is known to influence the magnitude of postprandial events that increase the risk of metabolic syndrome. These variations in magnitude may be directly ascribed to differences in the channeling of lipids toward oxidation or storage. A study was designed to compare the effects of 4 dietary fats on postprandial energy expenditure and on some risk factors of the metabolic syndrome. To avoid usual confounding factors due to simultaneous variations in chain length and double-bounds number of fatty acids, dietary fats were chosen to provide mainly 18-carbon fatty acids with 0 (stearic acid [SA]), 1 (oleic acid [OA]), 2 (linoleic acid [LA]), or 3 (alpha-linolenic acid [ALA]) double bounds. They were given as single high-fat test meals to 4 different groups of male rats. The resting metabolic rate and the lipid and carbohydrate oxidation were measured from oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production using indirect calorimetry 2 hours before and 6.5 hours after the test meal. Plasma glucose, triglyceride, and chylomicron concentrations were determined at 0, 1.5, and 4 hours after the test meal. Postprandial concentration of glucose and triglyceride did not vary with the nature of the test meals, whereas that of chylomicrons was the highest after the LA test meal and the lowest after the SA test meal. Postprandial increase in resting metabolic rate was the highest after the LA and OA test meals, and the lowest after the SA and ALA test meals. Compared with the 3 other diets, the ALA test meal enhanced lipid oxidation and decreased glucose oxidation during the early postprandial period (0.25-3.25 hours). This suggests that stearic acid may not induce all the adverse effects classically described for other saturated fatty acids and that alpha-linolenic acid may beneficially influence energy partitioning, especially during the early postprandial state.
高脂肪饮食中的脂肪酸组成被认为会影响餐后事件的程度,这些事件会增加代谢综合征的风险。这些程度上的差异可能直接归因于脂质向氧化或储存的不同途径。本研究旨在比较 4 种膳食脂肪对餐后能量消耗和代谢综合征某些危险因素的影响。为避免由于脂肪酸链长和双键数量同时变化而产生的常见混杂因素,选择膳食脂肪主要提供 18 碳脂肪酸,其双键数为 0(硬脂酸[SA])、1(油酸[OA])、2(亚油酸[LA])或 3(α-亚麻酸[ALA])。将它们作为单一高脂肪测试餐给予 4 组不同的雄性大鼠。在测试餐前 2 小时和 6.5 小时,通过间接测热法测量静息代谢率以及脂质和碳水化合物氧化。在测试餐后 0、1.5 和 4 小时测定血浆葡萄糖、甘油三酯和乳糜微粒浓度。餐后葡萄糖和甘油三酯浓度不因测试餐的性质而异,而乳糜微粒浓度在 LA 测试餐后最高,在 SA 测试餐后最低。餐后静息代谢率的增加在 LA 和 OA 测试餐后最高,在 SA 和 ALA 测试餐后最低。与其他 3 种饮食相比,ALA 测试餐在早餐后期(0.25-3.25 小时)增强了脂质氧化并减少了葡萄糖氧化。这表明硬脂酸可能不会引起其他饱和脂肪酸经典描述的所有不良影响,而α-亚麻酸可能有益地影响能量分配,特别是在早餐后。