Service of Thoracic Surgery, Salamanca University Hospital, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Mar;37(3):521-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
Exercise tests are considered the most reliable ones for the preoperative workup of lung resection candidates but frequently are indicated only in cases with low predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1) and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO). The aim of this investigation is to evaluate if a simple, standardised incremental bicycle exercise test routinely performed in patients considered operable is predictive of postoperative cardio-respiratory complication and if its performance is comparable to a logistic regression model including frequently cited clinical predictive variables.
A series of 103 lung resection candidates were included in a prospective observational study. All patients underwent a standardised, incremental exercise test on a bicycle up to exhaustion. The analysed outcome was the occurrence of postoperative cardio-respiratory complications prospectively recorded and codified. The correlation of distance reached at the end of the test and the outcome was estimated by non-parametric tests. A logistic regression model including age, BMI, predicted postoperative (ppoFEV1%) and predicted postoperative DLCO (ppoDLCO) was adjusted and the individual probability of complication calculated and set as a new variable. Finally, two receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and compared: one with distance at the exercise test and the other with logistic regression probability of complication.
Mortality of the series was nil. Outcome prevalence was 14%. Distance reached at the end of the exercise test was lower in cases with a positive outcome (3498.6m vs 4543.5m, p=0.001). On logistic regression analysis, age of the patient (p=0.016) and ppoDLCO (p=0.000) were predictive for the outcome. On ROC analysis, C-indices were 0.77 (distance) and 0.78 (logistic model, p=0.95).
Reached distance in a simple standardised exercise test is related to postoperative morbidity after lung resection; and the accuracy of prediction using this variable alone is comparable to a logistic regression model including age and ppoDLCO.
运动试验被认为是肺切除术候选者术前评估中最可靠的方法,但通常仅在预测术后 1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)较低的情况下进行。本研究旨在评估在被认为可手术的患者中常规进行的简单、标准化递增自行车运动试验是否可预测术后心肺并发症,以及其性能是否可与包括常引述的临床预测变量的逻辑回归模型相媲美。
一项前瞻性观察研究纳入了 103 例肺切除术候选者。所有患者均接受了标准化、递增自行车运动直至力竭。分析的结果是前瞻性记录和编码的术后心肺并发症的发生。通过非参数检验评估试验结束时达到的距离与结局的相关性。包括年龄、BMI、预测术后(ppoFEV1%)和预测术后 DLCO(ppoDLCO)在内的逻辑回归模型进行调整,并计算并发症的个体概率并设为新变量。最后,构建并比较了两个接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线:一个使用运动试验的距离,另一个使用逻辑回归并发症的概率。
该系列的死亡率为零。结果的发生率为 14%。阳性结果的患者在运动试验结束时达到的距离较低(3498.6m 与 4543.5m,p=0.001)。在逻辑回归分析中,患者年龄(p=0.016)和 ppoDLCO(p=0.000)是结果的预测因素。在 ROC 分析中,C 指数分别为 0.77(距离)和 0.78(逻辑模型,p=0.95)。
在简单标准化运动试验中达到的距离与肺切除术后的发病率相关;并且单独使用此变量进行预测的准确性与包括年龄和 ppoDLCO 的逻辑回归模型相当。