Ohlow M A, Schreiber M, Lauer B
Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Herzzentrum, Klinik für Kardiologie.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009 Oct;134(40):1984-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1237543. Epub 2009 Sep 23.
Interpretation of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a diagnostic challenge in many cases. The aim of this study was to determine whether board-certified emergency physicians (BCEP) are able to distinguish STEMI from non-STEMI in a large proportion of cases, thus assuring more precise prehospital triage and treatment.
Electrocardiograms of eight patients with acute non-traumatic chest pain (with 6 ECGs demonstrating STEMI, one with pericarditis, and one with pulmonary embolism) were assessed in a blinded fashion by 73 BCEP (19 female, mean age 37 +/- 5.3 years). Decisions had to be made by them regarding the diagnosis (STEMI or not) and treatment (immediate reperfusion or transfer to the nearest hospital without facilities for percutaneous coronary intervention).
In the ECGs with STEMI 83% of BCEPs made the correct diagnosis without significant differences between the subgroups. But in cases of non-STEMI-ECG only 30% of BECP made the correct diagnosis. The results in interpreting non-STEMI were better in older (> 50 years) BCEPs and in those with a background in internal medicine (p = 0.045, and p = 0.01, respectively). In case of STEMI 75% of BCEPs initiated the correct therapy, without significant differences between the subgroups. In case of non-STEMI ECG only 33% of BECPs made the correct diagnosis. Also, the therapeutic decisions in case of non-STEMI were better in older (> 50 years) BCEPs and in those with a background in internal medicine (p = 0.04, and p = 0.02 respectively).
In cases of acute non-traumatic chest pain the interpretation of the electrocardiogram by prehospital emergency doctors give to unsatisfactory results. The present study suggests, that additional training in ECG interpretation may be a critical component of the education of physicians who care for patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome.
在许多急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)病例中,对院前12导联心电图(ECG)的解读仍然是一项诊断挑战。本研究的目的是确定获得委员会认证的急诊医生(BCEP)是否能够在大部分病例中区分STEMI和非STEMI,从而确保更精确的院前分诊和治疗。
73名BCEP(19名女性,平均年龄37±5.3岁)以盲法评估了8例急性非创伤性胸痛患者的心电图(其中6份心电图显示为STEMI,1份为心包炎,1份为肺栓塞)。他们必须就诊断(是否为STEMI)和治疗(立即再灌注或转至最近的无经皮冠状动脉介入治疗设施的医院)做出决定。
在STEMI心电图中,83%的BCEP做出了正确诊断,各亚组之间无显著差异。但在非STEMI心电图病例中,只有30%的BECP做出了正确诊断。年龄较大(>50岁)的BCEP和有内科背景的BCEP在解读非STEMI心电图方面的结果更好(分别为p = 0.045和p = 0.01)。在STEMI病例中,75%的BCEP启动了正确的治疗,各亚组之间无显著差异。在非STEMI心电图病例中,只有33%的BECP做出了正确诊断。同样,年龄较大(>50岁)的BCEP和有内科背景的BCEP在非STEMI病例中的治疗决策更好(分别为p = 0.04和p = 0.02)。
在急性非创伤性胸痛病例中,院前急诊医生对心电图的解读结果不尽人意。本研究表明,心电图解读方面的额外培训可能是护理急性冠状动脉综合征患者的医生教育的关键组成部分。