Vasl Jozica, Oblak Alja, Gioannini Theresa L, Weiss Jerrold P, Jerala Roman
Department of Biotechnology, National Institute of Chemistry, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
J Immunol. 2009 Oct 15;183(8):5138-45. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901544. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
The MD-2/TLR4 complex provides a highly robust mechanism for recognition and response of mammalian innate immunity to Gram-negative bacterial endotoxins. Despite overall close structural and functional similarity, human (h) and murine (m) MD-2 show several species-related differences, including the ability of hMD-2, but not mMD-2, to bind endotoxin (E) in the absence of TLR4. Wild-type mMD-2 can support TLR4-dependent cell activation by E only when mMD-2 and mTLR4 are coexpressed in the same cell. However, replacement of Glu122, Leu125, and/or Asn58 of mMD-2 with the corresponding residues (lysines) of hMD-2 was sufficient to yield soluble extracellular MD-2 that reacted with monomeric E . sCD14 complex to form extracellular monomeric E . MD-2 that activated cells expressing TLR4 without MD-2. Moreover, in contrast to wild-type mMD-2, double and triple mMD-2 mutants also supported E-triggered signaling in combination with human TLR4. Conversely, a K125L mutant of hMD-2 reacted with E . CD14 and activated TLR4 only when coexpressed with TLR4, and not when secreted without TLR4. These findings reveal novel roles of lysines 122, 125, and 58 in human MD-2 that contribute to the functional differences between human and murine MD-2 and, potentially, to differences in the sensitivity of humans and mice to endotoxin.
MD-2/TLR4复合物为哺乳动物先天免疫识别革兰氏阴性菌内毒素并做出反应提供了一种高度强大的机制。尽管人(h)和鼠(m)MD-2在整体结构和功能上有密切的相似性,但它们也存在一些物种相关的差异,包括hMD-2而非mMD-2在没有TLR4时结合内毒素(E)的能力。野生型mMD-2只有在mMD-2和mTLR4在同一细胞中共表达时,才能支持E介导的依赖TLR4的细胞激活。然而,用hMD-2的相应残基(赖氨酸)替换mMD-2的Glu122、Leu125和/或Asn58,足以产生可溶的细胞外MD-2,其能与单体E.sCD14复合物反应形成细胞外单体E.MD-2,从而激活表达TLR4但不表达MD-2的细胞。此外,与野生型mMD-2不同,双突变和三突变的mMD-2与人类TLR4结合时也能支持E触发的信号传导。相反,hMD-2的K125L突变体只有在与TLR4共表达时才能与E.CD14反应并激活TLR4,而在没有TLR4时分泌则不能。这些发现揭示了人MD-2中赖氨酸122、125和58的新作用,这些作用导致了人和鼠MD-2之间的功能差异,并可能导致人和小鼠对内毒素敏感性的差异。